Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-18 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 17-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote: > > MAILDIR=/home/juergen/mail Thanks for your explanation, but the problem with this aproach is that I use my webmail interface to and it likes the mails in it's inbox, doing it with procmail will move the mail's away from the inbox into another inbox, but anyw

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 05:03:44PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > MAILDIR=/home/juergen/mail > > :0 Wh: msgid.lock > | formail -D 8192 .msgid.cache > > ignore that last ">". stupid slow connection. john -- "Voodoo Programming: Things programmers do that they know shouldn't work but they try an

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 05:33:18PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > > don't you use procmail > > Nope! How should I use it? in ~/.forward : |/usr/bin/procmail or whatever then in .procmailrc : MAILDIR=/home/juergen/mail :0 Wh: msgid.lock | formail -D 8192 .msgid.cache > that should do it >

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
> IMO it's not neccessary to pollute the net more then necessary. For a change I agree with you here ;-) Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 04:23:10PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > BTW.: I now spellcheck over/inside textinsets :) rocking ! way to go Juergen regards john -- "Voodoo Programming: Things programmers do that they know shouldn't work but they try anyway, and which sometimes actually work, suc

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 17-Jul-2001 John Levon wrote: > don't you use procmail Nope! How should I use it? (though yes, this is something the sender should be sorting out) IMO it's not neccessary to pollute the net more then necessary. Jürgen -- -._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-.

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 03:49:27PM +0200, Juergen Vigna wrote: > P.S.: And I really get your mail also if you send it only to lyx-devel, no > need to send it 2 times. don't you use procmail (though yes, this is something the sender should be sorting out) ? john -- "Voodoo Programming:

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
> Well I'll have a look at this after I commited my last changes. Fine. > BTW.: I now spellcheck over/inside textinsets :) All of us are very proud now. > BTW2.: keystrokes? I need to get used to 'L' instead of 'g' when replying... I am in the process of switching mail clients... Andre' --

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 17-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: >> Well you're are right. Maybe we should really split the return-code to >> FINISHED and FINISHED_BEHIND. Would that seem better to you? > > Definitely the latter. Well I'll have a look at this after I commited my last changes. BTW.: I now spellcheck over/i

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
> Well you're are right. Maybe we should really split the return-code to > FINISHED and FINISHED_BEHIND. Would that seem better to you? Definitely the latter. Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 17-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: >> Well what we could do is put the cursor ALWAYS after the inset when it >> returns finished and check for LFUNS which put it before the inset, maybe >> this decicion is easier for you. > > That's is a hack as well. It would help, of course Well you're a

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
> Well what we could do is put the cursor ALWAYS after the inset when it > returns finished and check for LFUNS which put it before the inset, maybe > this decicion is easier for you. That's is a hack as well. It would help, of course > > Did I mention lately that lyxfunc is a mess? ;-) > >

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 17-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: >> Well the cursor is ALWAYS before the inset when the inset is locked! >> When you unlock the inset and return FINISHED as result then you have >> to see what action unlocked the inset. > > I cannot make a sensible decision on where the cursor has to go after

Re: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
> Well the cursor is ALWAYS before the inset when the inset is locked! > When you unlock the inset and return FINISHED as result then you have > to see what action unlocked the inset. I cannot make a sensible decision on where the cursor has to go after leaving the inset based on the LFUN* code a

RE: leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread Juergen Vigna
On 17-Jul-2001 Andre Poenitz wrote: > > I have an item on my bug list "cursor is in front of math inset after > leaving". > > How do I correct this? Well the cursor is ALWAYS before the inset when the inset is locked! When you unlock the inset and return FINISHED as result then you have to se

leaving math insets

2001-07-17 Thread Andre Poenitz
I have an item on my bug list "cursor is in front of math inset after leaving". How do I correct this? Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]