Re: graphics patch 1

2002-05-28 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 02:46:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:58:11AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > > This seems to be a good first step. > > Fine. But I am stuck now. The list of backreferences is in the way... See my other mail; emit a signal... Angus

Re: graphics patch 1

2002-05-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 10:58:11AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote: > This seems to be a good first step. Fine. But I am stuck now. The list of backreferences is in the way... > GParams only came into existence > because InsetGraphicsParams was so foul and horrible [It's not better now. Actually, I

Re: graphics patch 1

2002-05-28 Thread Angus Leeming
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:20:25PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Would anybody mind if I moved the InsetGraphics related stuff from > src/graphics to insets/insetGraphics*? > > Like I started to do in the attached patch? [Not perfect, I know. Just > moving things around for starters] > > Goal

Re: graphics patch 1

2002-05-28 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:02:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> | Well does this make any sense ? Andre wants the "display a graphics" >> | functionality without the hassle of an inset. >> >> I have no strong opinions in this matter. > | So I c

Re: graphics patch 1

2002-05-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 01:02:58PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Well does this make any sense ? Andre wants the "display a graphics" > | functionality without the hassle of an inset. > > I have no strong opinions in this matter. So I can just start shuffling the InsetGraphics related st

Re: graphics patch 1

2002-05-28 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:40:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Either that or move all graphics stuff, including insets, to >> src/graphics. Much like the mathed source separation. > | Well does this make any sense ? Andre wants the "display a g

Re: graphics patch 1

2002-05-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:40:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | Would anybody mind if I moved the InsetGraphics related stuff from > | src/graphics to insets/insetGraphics*? > > Either that or move all graphics stuff, including insets, to > src/graphics. Much like the mathed source separ

Re: graphics patch 1

2002-05-28 Thread John Levon
On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 12:40:30PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Either that or move all graphics stuff, including insets, to > src/graphics. Much like the mathed source separation. Well does this make any sense ? Andre wants the "display a graphics" functionality without the hassle of an

Re: graphics patch 1

2002-05-28 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Would anybody mind if I moved the InsetGraphics related stuff from | src/graphics to insets/insetGraphics*? Either that or move all graphics stuff, including insets, to src/graphics. Much like the mathed source separation. -- Lgb

graphics patch 1

2002-05-28 Thread Andre Poenitz
Would anybody mind if I moved the InsetGraphics related stuff from src/graphics to insets/insetGraphics*? Like I started to do in the attached patch? [Not perfect, I know. Just moving things around for starters] Goal is better separation of functionality and possible code re-use for the preview