Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Please do not find new windmills to battle. We've got still a few
> left.
Si, señor!
--
Angus
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:04:42PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
> > That would be one option. In this case I did not like the difference
> > between 'main text paragraphs' and 'nested InsetText paragraphs'.
> > But as I slowly get the feeling there's indeed a difference betwee
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> That would be one option. In this case I did not like the difference
> between 'main text paragraphs' and 'nested InsetText paragraphs'.
> But as I slowly get the feeling there's indeed a difference between
> both some different handling might be in order...
Call me pedantic
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 02:20:30PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > The main problem here is that in this praticular case the mathed
> > approach is wrong, so I can't simply copy stuff. In mathed we have
> > everything relative to the top left of outermost inset. Translate
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> The main problem here is that in this praticular case the mathed
> approach is wrong, so I can't simply copy stuff. In mathed we have
> everything relative to the top left of outermost inset. Translated
> to the whole of LyX this would mean 'relative coordinates to upper
>
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 01:13:47PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | This is just for the record:
> >
> | The attached patch is a long shot at getting rid of inset locking.
> >
> |
> | Slightly off the mark, though.
> |
> >
> | It should appl
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 01:05:42PM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> >
> > This is just for the record:
> >
> > The attached patch is a long shot at getting rid of inset locking.
> >
> >
> > Slightly off the mark, though.
> >
> >
> > It should apply against last Thu
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| This is just for the record:
>
| The attached patch is a long shot at getting rid of inset locking.
>
|
| Slightly off the mark, though.
|
>
| It should apply against last Thursday's CVS but is full of conflicts
| now. I won't bother updating it
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> This is just for the record:
>
> The attached patch is a long shot at getting rid of inset locking.
>
>
> Slightly off the mark, though.
>
>
> It should apply against last Thursday's CVS but is full of conflicts
> now. I won't bother updating it as it completely brea
This is just for the record:
The attached patch is a long shot at getting rid of inset locking.
Slightly off the mark, though.
It should apply against last Thursday's CVS but is full of conflicts
now. I won't bother updating it as it completely breaks anything
releated to mouseclicks
10 matches
Mail list logo
