Re: gcc 2.95.2 miscompiles lyx 1.1.6 on Alpha

2001-01-19 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Tom" == Tom Holroyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> P.S. after more testing, the exit bug is still the only one I've Tom> found. Except the selection color defaulted to black for some Tom> reason but that's no biggie. 1.1.6 works pretty good. Did you get the backtrace by running under gd

Re: gcc 2.95.2 miscompiles lyx 1.1.6 on Alpha

2001-01-17 Thread Tom Holroyd
Oh, I'm also using version 0.89.0 of xforms...

Re: gcc 2.95.2 miscompiles lyx 1.1.6 on Alpha

2001-01-17 Thread Tom Holroyd
On 17 Jan 2001, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Tom> When I built Lyx 1.1.6 using gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 on > Tom> Alpha, it mostly works but I get an Illegal instruction when I > Tom> exit (or sometimes segmentation fault) -- it turns out to be > Tom> because of stack corruption that occurs s

Re: gcc 2.95.2 miscompiles lyx 1.1.6 on Alpha

2001-01-17 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Tom" == Tom Holroyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Tom> When I built Lyx 1.1.6 using gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 on Tom> Alpha, it mostly works but I get an Illegal instruction when I Tom> exit (or sometimes segmentation fault) -- it turns out to be Tom> because of stack corruption that occur

Re: gcc 2.95.2 miscompiles lyx 1.1.6 on Alpha

2001-01-17 Thread Tom Holroyd
On Wed, 17 Jan 2001, Tom Holroyd wrote: > When I built Lyx 1.1.6 using gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 on Alpha, it > mostly works but I get an Illegal instruction when I exit (or sometimes I got the same error using gcc version 2.95.3 20010112 (test2 prerelease). I've been using it a bit, doing the

gcc 2.95.2 miscompiles lyx 1.1.6 on Alpha

2001-01-16 Thread Tom Holroyd
When I built Lyx 1.1.6 using gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 on Alpha, it mostly works but I get an Illegal instruction when I exit (or sometimes segmentation fault) -- it turns out to be because of stack corruption that occurs somewhere after the return statement in main. There may be other places I