Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:55:47AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> | > > in case the order is wrong. Why not store
> | > > bool here;
> | > > bool top;
> | > > bool bottom;
> | > > etc. Then your
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Andre> On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:55:47AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> >> > in case the order is wrong. Why not store > bool here; > bool
> >> top; > bool bottom; > etc. Then your check will be easy.
>
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:32:00PM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:28:46PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Andre> And yes, there is a difference, and yes, current LyX gets it
> > Andre> wrong...
> >
> > I used to think that there is a difference. Now that I have re
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 12:28:46PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre> And yes, there is a difference, and yes, current LyX gets it
> Andre> wrong...
>
> I used to think that there is a difference. Now that I have read the
> latex code, I know that they implement this as a bitmask (which
On Monday 29 October 2001 11:21 am, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:55:47AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > > in case the order is wrong. Why not store
> > > bool here;
> > > bool top;
> > > bool bottom;
> > > etc. Then your check will be easy.
>
> This is
Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:55:47AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > > in case the order is wrong. Why not store
> > > bool here;
> > > bool top;
> > > bool bottom;
> > > etc. Then your check will be easy.
there is no easy check! it's cruel ...
> T
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:55:47AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > in case the order is wrong. Why not store
> > bool here;
> > bool top;
> > bool bottom;
> > etc. Then your check will be easy.
This is conceptually wrong: How would you tell the difference between "tb"
and "
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> This is nice enough, but what do people think about all this
Angus> feedback stuff? Would it be nicer as a bubble-help? This is
Angus> dead easy to do with xforms 0.89 but is a bit more convoluted
Angus> for 0.88. Nonetheless, we c
On Monday 29 October 2001 10:55 am, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > Also, why store
> > string placement
> > since this makes it hard (pointless) to check (p1.placement ==
p2.placement)
>
> don't know, ask Lars ...
> it's his stuff
That's never a reason not to change!
> > +int C_FormFloatFee
Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> I'm not trying to make life harder for you here!!! But:
:-)
> What default do you want for bool wide? true or false? As you have it, wide
> is undefined I think.
>
> FloatParams::FloatParams()
> - : placement("htbp")
> + : placement("htbp"), wide(false)
>
I'm not trying to make life harder for you here!!! But:
FloatParams::FloatParams()
- : placement("htbp")
+ : placement("htbp"), wide()
{}
What default do you want for bool wide? true or false? As you have it, wide
is undefined I think.
FloatParams::FloatParams()
- : plac
here is a patch for the not finished float-gui
placement is not checked, should be done when
user has the possibility to it wrong ...
attached also a gif with the feedback for the
exclamation button. default button gives htbp
Herbert
Index: src/frontends/controllers/ChangeLog
12 matches
Mail list logo
