On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 18:49, Andreas Vox wrote:
> I think all of us would like to have a shiny, bugfree 1.4 release of LyX
> as soon as possible (say for Christmas), but currently it looks as if there's
> not enough man power to reach that goal.
Actually it looks a lot better already than just
Andreas Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I don't know if you two get along when drinking beer or if you are sitting
| at opposite ends of the table then also,
beer bottles are nice blunt instruments.
We actually get a long pretty well.
| but it surely gives bad vibrations
| to read posts lik
Andreas Vox wrote:
> I don't know if you two get along when drinking beer or if you are
> sitting at opposite ends of the table then also, but it surely gives
> bad vibrations to read posts like this on the list.
When drinking beer they seem to get on fine, so long as they are both
at the same en
Lars Gullik BjÃnnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
< Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
<
< | To be even more blunt: This kind of work does not help us to get 1.4.0
< | out of the door. The small good it does is outweighed by distracting
< | people as seen e.g. in the XML discussion.
<
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| To be even more blunt: This kind of work does not help us to get 1.4.0
| out of the door. The small good it does is outweighed by distracting
| people as seen e.g. in the XML discussion.
Just to out-blunt you: I am not allowing you to command what _I_ d
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 09:34:32PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >>this->~SomeClass();
> >>new (this) SomeClass(foo);
> >>
> >> Does this work as intended? Or am I just way off?
> >
> | Maybe.
>
> I just had a look in my books and Mr. Sutter calls this the
> "anti-idom" and says to
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:33:23PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>
>> I am trying to make the inset hierarchy more immune to splicing and
>> wrong usage.
>>
>> In mathed this construct is used
>>
>>*this = SomeClass(foo);
>
| Where? In fact,
On poniedziaÅek 22 listopad 2004 01:26 pm, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:33:23PM +0100, Lars Gullik BjÃnnes wrote:
> > I am trying to make the inset hierarchy more immune to splicing and
> > wrong usage.
> >
> > In mathed this construct is used
> >
> >*this = SomeClass(foo);
On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 12:33:23PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I am trying to make the inset hierarchy more immune to splicing and
> wrong usage.
>
> In mathed this construct is used
>
>*this = SomeClass(foo);
Where? In fact, if this is Cursor/DocIterator code which retains anchor
I am trying to make the inset hierarchy more immune to splicing and
wrong usage.
In mathed this construct is used
*this = SomeClass(foo);
(or the variant this->operator(SomeClass(foo)) )
My method of avoiding splicing and wrong usage does not like this very
much... so I have replaced this w
10 matches
Mail list logo
