elsart.layout seems to be obsolete, but it is not mentioned so in
LatexConfig.lyx.
Also it is missing in CTAN at macros/latex/contrib/elsevier.
In contrast, elsarticle.layout is _not_ described in LatexConfig.lyx.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
> "Jürgen" == Jürgen Spitzmüller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jürgen> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931 A simple fix, as
Jürgen> \ack does not use a counter (it uses \section* internally) and
Jürgen> is output in plural form in DVI.
Jürgen> This could also go in branch. OK?
Yes. It
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3931
A simple fix, as \ack does not use a counter (it uses \section* internally)
and is output in plural form in DVI.
This could also go in branch. OK?
Jürgen
Index: lib/layouts/elsart.layout
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| $ rm -f elsart.layout
| $ cvs -q up
| U elsart.layout
| $ ls -l elsart.layout
| -rwxr-xr-x 1 aleem aleem 9784 Jul 19 14:23 elsart.layout
>
| This is true for both the 1.3.x and 1.4.x trees.
>
| Lars, could you fix this in the repository p
$ rm -f elsart.layout
$ cvs -q up
U elsart.layout
$ ls -l elsart.layout
-rwxr-xr-x 1 aleem aleem 9784 Jul 19 14:23 elsart.layout
This is true for both the 1.3.x and 1.4.x trees.
Lars, could you fix this in the repository please?
--
Angus
seveir as
> Elsevier. Basically I think it is correct.
>
> JMarc
My humblest apologies...I seemed to have once again been baffled by CVS.
After doing an update/make, the elsart.layout file I ended up with didn't
work, and had extra - and <<<<< bits in it.
Del
> "Rod" == Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rod> It appeared to have been merged badly. There were some extra dash
Rod> and <<< characters floating around. So essentially, it is the
Rod> patch done correctly. No change in functionality.
Maybe is it because I adjusted the spacing and rewr
It appeared to have been merged badly. There were some extra dash and <<<
characters floating around. So essentially, it is the patch done
correctly. No change in functionality.
The changelog entry might be excessive...
Rod
On Fri, 1 Aug 2003, Jean-Marc
Lasgouttes wrote:
> > "Rod" == Rod
> "Rod" == Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rod> Hopefully generated the diff correctly. My last change wasn't
Rod> correctly incorporated.
Hmm, what was wrong? You seem to be adding the same entry twice, don't
you?
JMarc
Rod> Patch below, generated with
Rod> cvs diff -u, for the top
Log,v
retrieving revision 1.487
diff -u -r1.487 ChangeLog
--- lib/ChangeLog 2003/07/31 10:53:28 1.487
+++ lib/ChangeLog 2003/08/01 02:42:40
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2003-08-01 Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+ * layouts/elsart.layout: correctly merge change of 2003-07-23
+ into
> "Rod" == Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rod> It may be a slow evolution. I'm currently trying to write a draft
Rod> paper using it, so I may come across other bits and bobs.
Which is the right way of doing things. I wish ore layout would
receive polish.
JMarc
> "Rod" == Rod Pinna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rod> Against the 1.4.0 cvs. Allows for numbered sections as does the
Rod> class file. Let me know if I've done the diff incorrectly.
I'd rather have unified diffs (diff -u) and also a diff to changelog.
Also, it is better if you are in top sou
le. Let me know if I've done the diff incorrectly.
> >
> > $cvs diff elsart.layout
>
> I believe "cvs diff -u" is more appreciated.
>
> Good! I'm glad to see elsart is getting in better shapes as
Against the 1.4.0 cvs. Allows for numbered sections as does the class
file. Let me know if I've done the diff incorrectly.
Rod
$cvs diff elsart.layout
Index: elsart.layout
===
RCS file: /cvs/ly
ope you are well) :-)).
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Andreas Richter wrote:
> Hi Alain,
>
> my name is Andreas, I found your name and email address through a search for
> "elsart.layout" on google on this page:
>
> http://www.uni-sw.gwdg.de/~pit/LyX/Archive/User/Nov199
15 matches
Mail list logo
