Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> So you want it in branch?
I would not oppose. Wait a few days. If nobody objects, put it in.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Looks like a good idea, but maybe people should try it out and see
>> whether they like it.
>
> I like it.
So you want it in branch?
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Looks like a good idea, but maybe people should try it out and see
> whether they like it.
I like it.
Jürgen
Le 18/01/2010 18:37, Edwin Leuven a écrit :
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What do you think of that?
if it works for you, it works for me
It is in now.
perhaps also for branch jürgen?
Looks like a good idea, but maybe people should try it out and see
whether they like it.
Uwe, where shoul
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
What do you think of that?
if it works for you, it works for me
perhaps also for branch jürgen?
Edwin Leuven writes:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> Excellent idea :) However, about the implmentation:
>
> any objections if i commit the attached, or am is missing something?
I propose something even simpler:
* remove check for caption
* do not test for enumerations either.
(I checked tha
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Excellent idea :) However, about the implmentation:
any objections if i commit the attached, or am is missing something?
Index: src/Text.cpp
===
--- src/Text.cpp(revision 33067)
+++ src/Text.cpp
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
* it looks like the code should be put inside the code below (instead of
the plain "return;").
i actually put it after recUndo to do this:
* make sure that undo is correctly handled (I do not know whether
changeDepth does it)
?
Index: src/Text.cpp
=
Le 16/01/2010 10:52, Edwin Leuven a écrit :
i remember a discussion a long time ago (i think it was jean-marc who
then suggested behavior like this)
Excellent idea :) However, about the implmentation:
* it looks like the code should be put inside the code below (instead of
the plain "return;")
hi guys,
at the moment it is a bit involved to snap out of an itemize or enumerate
the attached a little patch allows the following
when the cursor is in an empty indented item:
1. blah
(a) |
then decreases the depth:
1. blah
2. |
and when at the 1st level in an empty itemize/enumerat
10 matches
Mail list logo
