On Friday 07 June 2002 9:19 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Woo hoo! I have a decent compiler again!
> |
> | As for the warnings, there are thousands of em, especially in the boost
> | code! there are also some errors about stuff that's now in namespa
On Friday 07 June 2002 9:19 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Woo hoo! I have a decent compiler again!
> |
> | As for the warnings, there are thousands of em, especially in the boost
> | code! there are also some errors about stuff that's now in namespa
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Woo hoo! I have a decent compiler again!
>
| As for the warnings, there are thousands of em, especially in the boost code!
| there are also some errors about stuff that's now in namespace std, but
| that's by the by.
>
| However, these two warnings mi
Woo hoo! I have a decent compiler again!
As for the warnings, there are thousands of em, especially in the boost code!
there are also some errors about stuff that's now in namespace std, but
that's by the by.
However, these two warnings might prove important given the recent angst with
boost:
