On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:52:22PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:51:56PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > I thought there is one?
>
> The branch tag is a different thing from a point tag. I didn't see what
> command you typed to branch off ...
As Lars suggested:
cvs ta
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:51:56PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> I thought there is one?
The branch tag is a different thing from a point tag. I didn't see what
command you typed to branch off ...
john
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:40:53PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:36:50PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > So thius branching is essentially nothing else than a separate CVS
> > repository and the merging has to be done manually?
>
> Uh no. It's a bit more awkward than it
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 04:36:50PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> So thius branching is essentially nothing else than a separate CVS
> repository and the merging has to be done manually?
Uh no. It's a bit more awkward than it should be but it's definitely not
manual.
I'll do all the merges if you
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:33:25PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:41:29PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Is it ok to 'cvs commit' as usual after creating this branch or do I have
> > to do something special?
>
> The tricky bit is merging from the trunk onto the branch. W
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 03:41:29PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Is it ok to 'cvs commit' as usual after creating this branch or do I have
> to do something special?
The tricky bit is merging from the trunk onto the branch. We should do
it regularly, and to do it right you need to move a tag alon
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Is it ok to 'cvs commit' as usual after creating this branch or do I have
| to do something special?
Just check that in the tree that you want to commit in, have a file
"Tag" in the CVS dir. This "Tag" contents should then be
"BRANCH_NOUPDATE"
--
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andre> Is it ok to 'cvs commit' as usual after creating this branch or
Andre> do I have to do something special?
You can work as usual.
JMarc
Is it ok to 'cvs commit' as usual after creating this branch or do I have
to do something special?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
On Friday 31 May 2002 9:39 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | On Friday 31 May 2002 9:21 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> I need the original one "Better use of CVS"
> >>
> >> Can someone please send it to me?
> |
> | development/branches.html
>
> I a
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Friday 31 May 2002 9:21 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I need the original one "Better use of CVS"
>>
>> Can someone please send it to me?
>
| development/branches.html
I also found it in my mailbox.
--
Lgb
On Friday 31 May 2002 9:21 am, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> I need the original one "Better use of CVS"
>
> Can someone please send it to me?
development/branches.html
I need the original one "Better use of CVS"
Can someone please send it to me?
--
Lgb
Hi,
yesterday, Andre asked for a new cvs branch for mathed.
I don't know whether you have decided about this already but I would like
you to take into account that there are people (with |people| >= 2) who use
the cvs code and are longing for a stable mathed. Therefore, if you move
the
I think I just created a new branch lyxdoc-1_1_6-updates for 1.1.6
specific documentation updates. The main branch will start having 1.2.0
specific features. I got some funny error messages, so people who know
what they are doing should check it to make sure it is okay.
I committed a few minor up
15 matches
Mail list logo
