On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 08:20:11PM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I certainly can't. Isn't John our resident x11 guru?
If I ever knew anything, I've forgotten it all...
john
Angus Leeming wrote:
> If you can tell me what I should be looking for... My knowledge of X11
> internals isn't too deep...
I certainly can't. Isn't John our resident x11 guru?
Jürgen.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> Is this a kwin bug then? Is it the sort of bug that
>> the kde folks are interested in?
>
> I'm not sure since it seems to be a bug of some certain window decoration
> styles (especially SuSE's). KDE's default styles all seem to work.
> I wonder if the xforms dialogs
Angus Leeming wrote:
> What's a 'windecos'?
I meant: window decoration. The thing on top of the window.
> Is this a kwin bug then? Is it the sort of bug that
> the kde folks are interested in?
I'm not sure since it seems to be a bug of some certain window decoration
styles (especially SuSE's)
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> It seems that it depends on the window decoration. The problematic
> dialogs are all of very small width, and I suspect that some windecos
> have a minimal width. After I changed the window decoration from SuSE's
> default style to plastik, the dialogs are o.k.
What's
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Going out on a limb. What happens if you set your language environment to
> English. These dialogs were designed in English and this weird sizing
> suggests that the resizing has gone wrong...
no effect.
> > Maybe it has something to do with the window manager (kwin from kd
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> All but arrows, greek, AMS relations and AMS negations. Also the crashing
> ones look odd (see screenshot).
Going out on a limb. What happens if you set your language environment to
English. These dialogs were designed in English and this weird sizing
suggests that th
Angus Leeming wrote:
> I'm stumped. I take it that it is only these math panel sub dialogs that
> crash.
yes.
> What about the color picker dialog that can be launched from the
> preferences dialog? And the fiel browser dialog that can be lauched from a
> 'Browse...' button?
No and no.
> Does
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
>> > I'm just checking if a clean
>> > rebuild helps...
>>
>> Does not help.
>
> I just installed xforms 1.0.90 from source and did a rebuild. Did not
> help either.
I'm stumped. I take it that it is only these math panel sub dialogs that
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> > I'm just checking if a clean
> > rebuild helps...
>
> Does not help.
I just installed xforms 1.0.90 from source and did a rebuild. Did not help
either.
Jürgen.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> I'm just checking if a clean
> rebuild helps...
Does not help. BTW autogen.sh gives these errors (automake 1.7.6, autoconf
2.57):
Building Makefile templates...
.
Can't locate object method "path" via package "Autom4te::Request"
at /usr/bin/autom4te line 81
Angus Leeming wrote:
> Usual
> question applies: is the xforms library the same as the one you compiled
> lyx against (ie do header file and library match).
Yes, both from the SuSE 9.1 distro (xforms 1.0). I'm just checking if a clean
rebuild helps...
Jürgen.
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Open the mathpanel and some (e.g. the "dots") subdialog. Try to move the
> subdialog with the mouse.
No problems here.
An id of 255 is indeed suspicious. Looks horribly like an int to me. Usual
question applies: is the xforms library the same as the one you compile
Open the mathpanel and some (e.g. the "dots") subdialog. Try to move the
subdialog with the mouse.
Jürgen.
Configuration
Host type: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Special build flags:warnings assertions xforms-image-loader
C Compiler: gcc
C Compi
14 matches
Mail list logo
