On 14 Oct 1999 11:35:06 +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> "miyata" == miyata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>miyata> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Maybe I missed something. What is used instead? Is the
>>> autoconf/OS/2 good enough right now?
>
>miyata> Yes, at this
> "miyata" == miyata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
miyata> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Maybe I missed something. What is used instead? Is the
>> autoconf/OS/2 good enough right now?
miyata> Yes, at this moment. The problem is that the maintainer has
miyata> been enrolle
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe I missed something. What is used instead? Is the autoconf/OS/2
> good enough right now?
Yes, at this moment. The problem is that the maintainer has been
enrolled since February this year, and there was the earthquake
in Taiwan and we even
"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nevertheless, a working uniform GNU auto* stuff suite for every system
> would be preferable. At least autoconfig is working and does need only
> limited polishing of the Makefiles by hand. Sure, compilation out of
> the box is only possible with imake,
"Arnd Hanses" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| As a conclusion: Provide both possibilites for LyX. Provide an
| (unsupported!) Imakefile as a fallback, update it only when you are
| bored and let those try who want to try.
You are free to do so, but please hide it down in some OS/2 dir. We
used to
> "Shigeru" == Shigeru Miyata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Shigeru> Well, since we do not use the top level configure.cmd any
Shigeru> more, could you ditch it away?
Maybe I missed something. What is used instead? Is the autoconf/OS/2
good enough right now?
JMarc
On Sat, 09 Oct 1999 06:57:22 +0900, Shigeru Miyata wrote:
>? It is not perfect, lib/reLyX/configure still requires additional
>workaround.
This will be the most static script. I don't see many problems here.
>But I think this is the right direction.
>How do you think?
Even though I always '
Well, since we do not use the top level configure.cmd
any more, could you ditch it away?
On the other hand, lib/configure.cmd must be used on OS/2,
is it not possible to do something on config/lib_configure.m4
so that the resulting lib/configure will look like
--- configure.orig Tue Sep 28 0
