Re: configure question

2002-03-15 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Thanks for the info, JMarc. I will try it. Incidentally, I Angus> found that, in order to get the configure test to run properly: Angus> LYX_USE_XFORMS_IMAGE_LOADER Angus> I had to define CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include rather than

Re: configure question

2002-03-14 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Thanks for the info, JMarc. I will try it. Incidentally, I Angus> found that, in order to get the configure test to run properly: Angus> LYX_USE_XFORMS_IMAGE_LOADER Angus> I had to define CPPFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include rather than

Re: configure question

2002-03-13 Thread Angus Leeming
On Wednesday 13 March 2002 12:28 pm, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> Having just updated my tree, JMarc's change to configure.in > Angus> triggered an automatic rerun of configure. In the past this has > Angus> failed to run correctly, because configure has insisted on > Angus> using g++ rath

Re: configure question

2002-03-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Having just updated my tree, JMarc's change to configure.in Angus> triggered an automatic rerun of configure. In the past this has Angus> failed to run correctly, because configure has insisted on Angus> using g++ rather than deccx

configure question

2002-03-12 Thread Angus Leeming
Having just updated my tree, JMarc's change to configure.in triggered an automatic rerun of configure. In the past this has failed to run correctly, because configure has insisted on using g++ rather than deccxx. I have, therefore, had to run the configure script as CXX=deccxx configur

lib/configure question

2002-03-01 Thread Angus Leeming
It seems that lib/configure part of cvs as well as lib/configure.m4? Why? A

Re: a configure question

2000-10-04 Thread Allan Rae
On 4 Oct 2000, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Angus> Can I ask why the sigc++ configure script repeats so many of > Angus> the tests already performed in the base directory? It loads up > Angus> ../config.cache. Isn't this enough? It

Re: a configure question

2000-10-04 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> Can I ask why the sigc++ configure script repeats so many of Angus> the tests already performed in the base directory? It loads up Angus> ../config.cache. Isn't this enough? It seems such a waste of Angus> effort to do everything t

a configure question

2000-10-04 Thread Angus Leeming
Can I ask why the sigc++ configure script repeats so many of the tests already performed in the base directory? It loads up ../config.cache. Isn't this enough? It seems such a waste of effort to do everything twice. Angus