>> Allan Rae writes:
AR> On 15 Feb 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> I have investigated a bit on why it is so hard to compile devel
>> lyx. Two reasons:
>>
>> 1. "class LString;" should not be used in headerfiles. Change it
>> to "#include "LString.h"
AR> We might be able us
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JL> gcc 2.8.1 does not have stl/bastring.h, but lyx does not compile
JL> there. I have to admit that I have not tried it recently.
Lars> ok, my mistake. Try std/bastring.h instead.
JL> S
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JL> gcc 2.8.1 does not have stl/bastring.h, but lyx does not compile
JL> there. I have to admit that I have not tried it recently.
Lars> ok, my mistake. Try std/bastring.h instead.
So, I just have to check whether this header file
On Don, 18 Feb 1999 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>>> Jochen Kuepper writes:
>
> JK> On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> 2. The string class supplied with gcc and egcs are not compatible
> >> with STL string. So the check we use to decide if the included
> >> string class should b
On 15 Feb 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> I have investigated a bit on why it is so hard to compile devel lyx.
> Two reasons:
>
> 1. "class LString;" should not be used in headerfiles. Change
> it to "#include "LString.h"
We might be able use a #define LString whatever_str
>> Jochen Kuepper writes:
JK> On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> 2. The string class supplied with gcc and egcs are not compatible
>> with STL string. So the check we use to decide if the included
>> string class should be used of not is wrong. We should try to
>> find
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JL> We should probably make --with-included-string the default and
JL> remove the automatic test, then. If even egcs is not good
JL> enough, I'm not sure that LyX is ready to use STL strings
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JL> We should probably make --with-included-string the default and
JL> remove the automatic test, then. If even egcs is not good enough,
JL> I'm not sure that LyX is ready to use STL strings.
Lars> LyX is ready, LString is a true su
On Mon, 15 Feb 1999 Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> 2. The string class supplied with gcc and egcs are not
> compatible with STL string. So the check we use to decide
> if the included string class should be used of not is
> wrong. We should try to find a better chec
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes writes:
>> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I have investigated a bit on why it is so hard to compile
Lars> devel lyx. Two reasons:
Lars> 1. "class LString;" should not be used in headerfiles. Change
Lars> it to "#include "LS
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Lars> I have investigated a bit on why it is so hard to compile devel
Lars> lyx. Two reasons:
Lars> 1. "class LString;" should not be used in headerfiles. Change
Lars> it to "#include "LString.h"
Lars> 2. The string class supp
I have investigated a bit on why it is so hard to compile devel lyx.
Two reasons:
1. "class LString;" should not be used in headerfiles. Change
it to "#include "LString.h"
2. The string class supplied with gcc and egcs are not
compatible with STL string. S
12 matches
Mail list logo
