Re: compile questions

2002-03-13 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | We just Lars> have to avoid mentionning @DEFS@ in Makefile.am:s. Lars> I cannot see a single @DEFS@. You are right indeed. They are in Makefile.in. Lars> Or do you mean that

Re: compile questions

2002-03-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | We just have to avoid mentionning @DEFS@ in Makefile.am:s. I cannot see a single @DEFS@. Or do you mean that we should set DEFS = ?? -- Lgb

Re: compile questions

2002-03-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 05:48:25PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >>> Yes, but LyX _does_ depend on config.h, anyway... >> Lars> | sure, but how do you remove it ? >> Lars>

Re: compile questions

2002-03-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 05:48:25PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >> Yes, but LyX _does_ depend on config.h, anyway... > | sure, but how do you remove it ? > | my grep hasn't finished yet but I'm mildly sure it's added inside code | that is not ours

Re: compile questions

2002-03-12 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 05:48:25PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Yes, but LyX _does_ depend on config.h, anyway... sure, but how do you remove it ? my grep hasn't finished yet but I'm mildly sure it's added inside code that is not ours regards john -- I am a complete moron for forgetti

Re: compile questions

2002-03-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:36:08PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >> And while we're at it, what's the point of -DHAVE_CONFIG_H John> autotools add it, so that programs don't have to depend on John> config.h Yes, but LyX _does_ depend on

Re: compile questions

2002-03-12 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> And while we're at it, what's the point of -DHAVE_CONFIG_H ? I think we really do not need this one, except _maybe_ in support/. JMarc

Re: compile questions

2002-03-12 Thread John Levon
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 04:36:08PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > And while we're at it, what's the point of > -DHAVE_CONFIG_H autotools add it, so that programs don't have to depend on config.h john -- I am a complete moron for forgetting about endianness. May I be forever marked as su

compile questions

2002-03-12 Thread Angus Leeming
cxx -std strict_ansi -nocleanup -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.. -I.. -I../boost -I./xforms -I../src/cheaders -I/usr/local/include -msg_display_number -msg_disable 11,193,236,261,401,611 -w0 -ptr ../lyx_cxx_repository -O2 -MD -c buffer.C Err. Why -I./xforms ? This is v. ne