On Tuesday 29 January 2002 9:47 am, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Whether this bloody program links if you remove paragraph and document
from
> > the Qt frontend!
>
> If I remove them from the Makefile *and* Dialogs.C it does. If that's your
> question :-)
It was. Other people report other, differen
> Whether this bloody program links if you remove paragraph and document from
> the Qt frontend!
If I remove them from the Makefile *and* Dialogs.C it does. If that's your
question :-)
Ed.
On Tuesday 29 January 2002 9:32 am, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > Could you let me know?
>
> what?
>
> Ed.
Whether this bloody program links if you remove paragraph and document from
the Qt frontend!
> Could you let me know?
what?
Ed.
On Tuesday 29 January 2002 8:46 am, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> On Monday 28 January 2002 05:53 pm, you wrote:
> > Who knows anything about template instantiations of classes? It seems to
me
> > that the following code is working flawlessly on all compilers:
> > But that that gcc wouldn't necessarily i
On Monday 28 January 2002 05:53 pm, you wrote:
> Who knows anything about template instantiations of classes? It seems to me
> that the following code is working flawlessly on all compilers:
> But that that gcc wouldn't necessarily instantiate all the methods here:
> This doesn't make much sense t
On Monday 28 January 2002 4:37 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:18:17PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
>
> > > I've removed the Qt versions for now, and it builds.
> >
> > still doesn't build for me though. gcc-c++-2.96-85 & latest cvs:
>
> Well it didn't build for me, and then d
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:18:17PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > I've removed the Qt versions for now, and it builds.
>
> still doesn't build for me though. gcc-c++-2.96-85 & latest cvs:
Well it didn't build for me, and then did. I have the same compiler.
Are you sure you did a "make clean"
On Monday 28 January 2002 12:18 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > I've removed the Qt versions for now, and it builds.
>
> still doesn't build for me though. gcc-c++-2.96-85 & latest cvs:
>
> /lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96
> -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/../../.. -lstdc++ -lgcc -lgc
> I've removed the Qt versions for now, and it builds.
still doesn't build for me though. gcc-c++-2.96-85 & latest cvs:
/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96
-L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/2.96/../../.. -lstdc++ -lgcc -lgcc -lbz2
-lSM -lICE -liberty -lc -lm -lX11 -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/loca
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 05:26:52PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> Can you compile and link if you remove the xforms Paragraph and Document
> dialogs also?
I've removed the Qt versions for now, and it builds. Edwin, I'm comitting this,
I wrote a changelog for you ;)
regards
john
--
"ALL televis
On Friday 25 January 2002 5:22 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:30:39PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>
> > why do you have FormParagraph.o, FormDocument.o in libfrontends.a at all?
> > Because, you pair of noodles, you have form_paragraph.lo,
form_document.lo in
> > Makefile
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:30:39PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> why do you have FormParagraph.o, FormDocument.o in libfrontends.a at all?
> Because, you pair of noodles, you have form_paragraph.lo, form_document.lo in
> Makefile.am
We want to remove the QPar/Doc versions instead, they are no
More to the point, why the hell is
../controllers/ButtonControllerBase.lo \
in qt2/Makefile.am
and for that matter what's this doing
@LYX_LIBS@ @FRONTEND_LDFLAGS@ @FRONTEND_LIBS@
Angus
On Friday 25 January 2002 3:14 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Shall I just comment out the Paragraph and Document dialog and commit the
> float stuff?
Ed, I'm a bit confused by the qt2 frontend.
Why do you have entries in Makefile.dialogs for Qdocument and for QParagraph
and then also have entries
On Friday 25 January 2002 3:00 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> > > no idea ! You forgot to remove xforms float from Makefile.am btw
> >
> > Try this first and then my suggestion afterwards!
>
> neither one worked! :-(
I meant in the xforms directory since the button controller appears to think
it's a
Shall I just comment out the Paragraph and Document dialog and commit the
float stuff?
Ed.
> > no idea ! You forgot to remove xforms float from Makefile.am btw
>
> Try this first and then my suggestion afterwards!
neither one worked! :-(
Any suggestions on how to proceed?
Thanks, Ed.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 02:44:21PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > no idea ! You forgot to remove xforms float from Makefile.am btw
>
> Try this first and then my suggestion afterwards!
neither help
john
--
"ALL television is children's television."
- Richard Adler
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 02:42:52PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> I'm a bit lost too as all works fine for me. That's not to say that there's
> not a problem and you aren't the only one mentioning such difficulties, but
> they do appear to be compiler dependant.
I see it with gcc 2.96
> Add
>
On Friday 25 January 2002 2:45 pm, John Levon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:33:21PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
>
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > No takers? I am really lost. HAs it got something to do with the inline
> > functions in FormParagraph.h and FormDocument.h?
> >
> > Help is appreciated.
On Friday 25 January 2002 2:33 pm, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> No takers? I am really lost. HAs it got something to do with the inline
> functions in FormParagraph.h and FormDocument.h?
Hi, Ed.
I'm a bit lost too as all works fine for me. That's not to say that there's
not a problem a
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:33:21PM +0100, Edwin Leuven wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> No takers? I am really lost. HAs it got something to do with the inline
> functions in FormParagraph.h and FormDocument.h?
>
> Help is appreciated. Cleanly applying patch attached.
no idea ! You forgot to remove xfo
Hey guys,
No takers? I am really lost. HAs it got something to do with the inline
functions in FormParagraph.h and FormDocument.h?
Help is appreciated. Cleanly applying patch attached.
Thanks a lot, Ed.
On Wednesday 23 January 2002 03:28 pm, you wrote:
> When compiling the attached patch I ge
24 matches
Mail list logo
