Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote:
> I'm not yet sure whether we should make one document of both the
> Rules/Language Advice/Style and the implementation/design issues.
i would prefer one doc.
pavel
> perhaps kill the old ascii file (or move it to attic) so there is unambiguous
> location.
Yes, I will. I wanted to wait until this new document is somewhat
decent (I'm not sure why though).
>also you nice log about casts could be saved somewhere.
It's already in there, but I hide it in the app
Stephan Witt wrote:
> > Maybe we can create another document on the design principles and
> > major structure in the LyX code. There are already some pieces, but we
> > have to get them up to date and to put them in one place.
> >
> > Comments ?
perhaps kill the old ascii file (or move it to atti
Am 27.10.2010 um 07:04 schrieb Vincent van Ravesteijn:
> Hi All,
>
> I converted the two files about Rules and Recommendation into a LyX
> document. You might want to have a look at it, and put your two cents
> in there about coding principle, style and so forth. It is still a bit
> a mess, but I
Hi All,
I converted the two files about Rules and Recommendation into a LyX
document. You might want to have a look at it, and put your two cents
in there about coding principle, style and so forth. It is still a bit
a mess, but I hope it will get better.
Everyone is invited to edit. Please turn
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So reformulate "short"?
Thanks.
JMarc
On Sun, Sep 30, 2007 at 05:42:51PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > -We also require you to provide a ChangeLog entry with every patch, this
> > -describes shortly what the patch is doing. The ChangeLog entry follows
> > -this syntax:
> > +We als
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -We also require you to provide a ChangeLog entry with every patch, this
> -describes shortly what the patch is doing. The ChangeLog entry follows
> -this syntax:
> +We also require you to provide a commit message entry with every patch,
> +this describe
Should be uncontroversial, but I'll wait for a nod.
I have a few more controversial ones up my sleeve...
Andre'
Index: Rules
===
--- Rules (revision 20603)
+++ Rules (working copy)
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
but still, we don't
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I'd like to use development/Code_rules in some modified version for
| internal (more or less educational) purposes. I would of course include a
| small header concerning the origin of the document.
|
| Does anybody feel that this is not a good thing
On 07-Mar-2000 Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> I'd like to use development/Code_rules in some modified version for
> internal (more or less educational) purposes. I would of course include a
> small header concerning the origin of the document.
>
> Does anybody feel that this is not a good thing do?
I'd like to use development/Code_rules in some modified version for
internal (more or less educational) purposes. I would of course include a
small header concerning the origin of the document.
Does anybody feel that this is not a good thing do?
Andre'
--
It'll take a long time to eat 63.00
12 matches
Mail list logo
