On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 01:51:24AM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 2/19/20 9:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:08:47PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> >
> >> On 2/19/20 4:48 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>> It is a good idea to have correct padding by
On 2/19/20 9:56 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:08:47PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
>
>> On 2/19/20 4:48 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> It is a good idea to have correct padding by reordering members, even if
>>> the memory gains are minimal for buffer::impl .
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 05:08:47PM -0500, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote:
> On 2/19/20 4:48 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > It is a good idea to have correct padding by reordering members, even if
> > the memory gains are minimal for buffer::impl . Do you have that for other
> > classes ?
>
>
>
> Le 19 février 2020 21:24:15 GMT+01:00, Richard Kimberly Heck
a écrit :
>> I'm seeing a lot of warnings in QtCreator of the form:
>>
>> Buffer.cpp:219:11: warning: padding class 'lyx::Buffer::Impl' with 3
>> bytes to align 'filename'
>>
>> I take it that this is because there were five bools ri
It is a good idea to have correct padding by reordering members, even if the
memory gains are minimal for buffer::impl . Do you have that for other classes ?
Note that padding needs are not the same for 32bist and 64bits, and probably
not the same for Linux and windows.
JMarc
Le 19 février 202
I'm seeing a lot of warnings in QtCreator of the form:
Buffer.cpp:219:11: warning: padding class 'lyx::Buffer::Impl' with 3
bytes to align 'filename'
I take it that this is because there were five bools right before this
declaration. Do we care about this?
Riki
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-d
