Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Let us propagate the rule then!
That's a good idea.
... if we do not forget to cleanup afterwards.
I think the plan was that Uwe would basically be in charge of cleanup.
And maybe he wouldn't feel t
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Let us propagate the rule then!
>
> That's a good idea.
... if we do not forget to cleanup afterwards.
JMarc
On 24/09/2008 20:53, Richard Heck wrote:
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Maybe we should adopt a new rule: Any changes made to the docs by
anyone but you (or your designated appointee) should be done with
change tracking enabled. Then you can check them out and accept or
reject the changes, and then check t
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
rgheck schrieb:
You can see from the diff itself, more or less, what I did.
Yes, but that costs me some time since diffs doesn't read well.
Telling me the changed sections would be enough. I will then read them
find out the differences according to the diff.
I also added
rgheck schrieb:
You can see from the diff itself, more or less, what I did.
Yes, but that costs me some time since diffs doesn't read well. Telling me the changed sections
would be enough. I will then read them find out the differences according to the diff.
I also added a little bit
to th
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Hello Richard,
thanks for your documentation update. But I need to keep the diferent
language versions in sync. So could you please tell me what you
changed in what sections when you update the docs. I can then update
the other language versions or tell the translators.
So
Hello Richard,
thanks for your documentation update. But I need to keep the diferent language versions in sync. So
could you please tell me what you changed in what sections when you update the docs. I can then
update the other language versions or tell the translators.
(The French, Japanese,
