Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> I read this, my question was about the spacing around these characters.
If the spacing would be different, the glyphs would not have been declared
equivalent.
Jürgen
> The unicode specification states that the two glyphs are identical.
I read this, my question was about the spacing around these characters.
regards Uwe
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Jürgen, are you sure this is correct? \textquoteleft suppresses some space
> between itself and the following letter, while a modifier letter don't do,
> as far I know. But maybe I don't know enough about modifier letters.
The unicode specification states that the two glyphs are
> #0x02bb "" "" "" # MODIFIER LETTER TURNED COMMA
> 0x02bb "\\textquoteleft" "" "" # MODIFIER LETTER TURNED COMMA
Jürgen, are you sure this is correct? \textquoteleft suppresses some space between itself and the
following letter, while a modifier letter don't do
