Re: changeset 21801: Paragraph.cpp

2007-11-27 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > Well, I consider you the LateX expert (which I am obviously not) and that's why I asked you ;-) Seems that we are two half-experts ;-) What about this: You merge the code from Paragraph.cpp to Newline.cpp, send me the patch, and I will check that the LaTeX-output is correc

Re: changeset 21801: Paragraph.cpp

2007-11-27 Thread Uwe Stöhr
> Well, I consider you the LateX expert (which I am obviously not) and that's why I asked you ;-) Seems that we are two half-experts ;-) What about this: You merge the code from Paragraph.cpp to Newline.cpp, send me the patch, and I will check that the LaTeX-output is correct. regards Uwe

Re: changeset 21801: Paragraph.cpp

2007-11-27 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Uwe Stöhr wrote: > could you please try to transfer this code to InsetNewLine::latex()? I tried this but failed. My problems were where to get the informations about \protect etc. in newline.cpp. In my newline patch I have only removed one line from Paragraph.cpp, so the code couldn't be wors

Re: changeset 21801: Paragraph.cpp

2007-11-27 Thread Uwe Stöhr
> could you please try to transfer this code to InsetNewLine::latex()? I tried this but failed. My problems were where to get the informations about \protect etc. in newline.cpp. In my newline patch I have only removed one line from Paragraph.cpp, so the code couldn't be worse than before. (The

Re: changeset 21801: Paragraph.cpp

2007-11-26 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Uwe Stöhr wrote: Hello Abdel, your change http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21801 broke the LaTeX output of \newline, \\, and \linebreak. There must be no return. To be able to work with LyX again, I reverted it. No problem, I was just restoring the code in the same state as previously. As

changeset 21801: Paragraph.cpp

2007-11-26 Thread Uwe Stöhr
Hello Abdel, your change http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/21801 broke the LaTeX output of \newline, \\, and \linebreak. There must be no return. To be able to work with LyX again, I reverted it. regards Uwe