On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 03:30:18PM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:23:17AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > Where is it used (aka "#include"d)?
>
> It seems that we haven't had any autoconf code for it for quite some
> time. Don't forget to change configure.ac too :)
I was
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:57:39PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> But I guess simly removing 'memmove' somewhere should suffice?
??
I just meant the mention of BROKEN_HEADERS in AH_BOTTOM.
> > > So any objection against a 'cvs remove'?
>
> ?
remove it
john
--
Khendon's Law:
If the same poin
What are
broken_headers.h
and
tracer.[Ch]
good for?
Andre'
--
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:23:17AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> Where is it used (aka "#include"d)?
It seems that we haven't had any autoconf code for it for quite some
time. Don't forget to change configure.ac too :)
> So any objection against a 'cvs remove'?
Certainly
john
--
Khendon's La
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 10:13:33AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:11:12AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
>
> > broken_headers.h
>
> Self-documenting. I doubt it applies to any reasonable Sun system today,
> and we (obviously) do not care
Where is it used (aka "#include"d)?
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 11:11:12AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> broken_headers.h
Self-documenting. I doubt it applies to any reasonable Sun system today,
and we (obviously) do not care
> tracer.[Ch]
I doubt anybody has used it for years. Don't forget the commented out
include
regards
john
