Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > I have reviewed our lyx.spec.in and did some further update. See attached
> > patch.
>
> Looks good.
Committed.
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller writes:
> I have reviewed our lyx.spec.in and did some further update. See attached
> patch.
Looks good.
JMarc
rgheck wrote:
> > Two solutions:
> > * change back to xpm and reinclude our old xpm icon.
> > * remove the Icon tag completely.
> >
> >
>
> I'd go with the former. Of course, we could include both xpm and png in
> the build.
Actually, I tend towards the latter. This icon is really just for the R
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Our RPM spec file currently doesn't build, because we have specified
Icon: %{name}.png
whereas only XPM (preferred) and GIF formats are supported, see
http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html
Note that this icon is only used for displaying inside some package
Our RPM spec file currently doesn't build, because we have specified
Icon: %{name}.png
whereas only XPM (preferred) and GIF formats are supported, see
http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-tags.html
Note that this icon is only used for displaying inside some package managers,
it's _not_ the ap
