Le 21/10/2016 à 18:02, Richard Heck a écrit :
What shall we do about 2.2.x? The warnings with gcc 6 are annoying, so
I guess we will eventually have to update for branch.
They are indeed annoying. This seems a good time to do it for stable,
since we just did a release and have lots of time for
On 10/21/2016 09:41 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 19/10/2016 à 17:37, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
>> commit 46c6f4de670ac1f930542ca2bd967e5bb6fba940
>> Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
>> Date: Wed Oct 19 17:31:54 2016 +0200
>>
>> Update lo
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:56:40PM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Random access is linear with sets. QCompleter needs this, and even
in the
case of sorted completions (where a binary search is possible) it
will
search the first element matching a prefix which is O(log n)*O(n)
operation
the
Am 24.02.2008 um 13:18 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:56:40PM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Random access is linear with sets. QCompleter needs this, and even
in the
case of sorted completions (where a binary search is possible) it
will
search the first element matching
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 12:56:40PM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Random access is linear with sets. QCompleter needs this, and even in the
> case of sorted completions (where a binary search is possible) it will
> search the first element matching a prefix which is O(log n)*O(n) operation
>
library.
Unfortunately this is not in the boost version we have in svn. Is
it just
old or do we have only a selection of boost modules?
We only bundle those parts of boost that we actively use, so if you
really need it, we would add it...
However, you'll have a hard time to convince me
e boost library.
>>> Unfortunately this is not in the boost version we have in svn. Is it just
>>> old or do we have only a selection of boost modules?
>>
>> We only bundle those parts of boost that we actively use, so if you
>> really need it, we would add
Am 24.02.2008 um 11:14 schrieb Andre Poenitz:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:33:18PM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
I would like to use the multi_index classes from the boost library.
Unfortunately this is not in the boost version we have in svn. Is
it just
old or do we have only a
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 11:33:18PM +0100, Stefan Schimanski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I would like to use the multi_index classes from the boost library.
> Unfortunately this is not in the boost version we have in svn. Is it just
> old or do we have only a selection of boost modules?
Stefan Schimanski wrote:
Hi!
I would like to use the multi_index classes from the boost library.
Unfortunately this is not in the boost version we have in svn. Is it
just old or do we have only a selection of boost modules?
Only those libraries that are actually used by LyX. While you&#x
Hi!
I would like to use the multi_index classes from the boost library.
Unfortunately this is not in the boost version we have in svn. Is it
just old or do we have only a selection of boost modules?
Stefan
Uwe Stöhr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Parker has send a patch to check the boost version for compilation:
> http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4118
>
> Perhaps it is useful, can a boost expert could have a look at this?
We will try to do something much lighter.
JMarc
Tom Parker has send a patch to check the boost version for compilation:
http://bugzilla.lyx.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4118
Perhaps it is useful, can a boost expert could have a look at this?
regards Uwe
13 matches
Mail list logo
