On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 08:12:04PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:11:24AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>
> >> | Probably a better solution than I proposed is sendin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lars Gullik Bjønnes) writes:
| Changes that limit developers just since we want to avoid spam or
| virii is not good.
smoking away again I see...
--
Lgb
Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:11:24AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>> Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> | Probably a better solution than I proposed is sending a too big
>> | message to a special address/list.
>>
>> imho all changes that
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 09:11:24AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Probably a better solution than I proposed is sending a too big
> | message to a special address/list.
>
> imho all changes that are intrusivve on the usage of the lists are bad.
Mate Wierdl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Probably a better solution than I proposed is sending a too big
| message to a special address/list.
imho all changes that are intrusivve on the usage of the lists are bad.
are sure you cannot plug in procmaqiø somewhere and do some super
simple filter
Probably a better solution than I proposed is sending a too big
message to a special address/list.
Mate
