Georg Baum wrote:
> Am Freitag, 7. Februar 2003 16:01 schrieb Dekel Tsur:
>> From lyx-users:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:10:12PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> > Our BibTeX parser isn't very robust. All will be fine if you move the
>> > key onto the same line as the @article etc.
>>
>> Can we
Am Freitag, 7. Februar 2003 16:01 schrieb Dekel Tsur:
> From lyx-users:
>
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:10:12PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Our BibTeX parser isn't very robust. All will be fine if you move the
> > key onto the same line as the @article etc.
>
> Can we find a more robust parser i
Angus Leeming wrote:
> I did improve it, yes, but don't have access to the machine on which it
> currently resides. (I'm working from home and that machine is in the office
> and currently turned off.)
OK. Sorry for hassling you, but I'm really interested (and willing to help
improving it). Actua
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote:
> Angus Leeming wrote:
>> I have a little shell script to create a lyx buffer from a bibtex
>> database. Perhaps you'd care to look/comment?
>
> Do you have a new version where the script does not bail out anymore when
> bibtex gives warnings (that was Exit Status = 2)
Angus Leeming wrote:
> I have a little shell script to create a lyx buffer from a bibtex database.
> Perhaps you'd care to look/comment?
Do you have a new version where the script does not bail out anymore when
bibtex gives warnings (that was Exit Status = 2)? Also I seem to rember that
the scri
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> From lyx-users:
> On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:10:12PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >
>> > I've recently upgraded from lyx 1.1.6 to 1.2.1 and have run into some
>> > problems with bibtex. My old lyx files still compile perfectly with all
>> > refere
Dekel Tsur wrote:
> > Our BibTeX parser isn't very robust. All will be fine if you move the key
> > onto the same line as the @article etc.
>
> Can we find a more robust parser in bibliography management programs
> (e.g. gbib) ?
Pybliographer uses recode which is probably a bit overkill. But Angus
>From lyx-users:
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:10:12PM +, Angus Leeming wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I've recently upgraded from lyx 1.1.6 to 1.2.1 and have run into some
> > problems with bibtex. My old lyx files still compile perfectly with all
> > references in order, however when
