Rami wrote:
> I wish to know if any improvement was made since 2010. today I tried to use
No. It would need someone to work on it. Perhpas you? :)
Pavel
Janek Kozicki writes:
>
> Liviu Andronic said: (by the date of Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:09:40 +)
>
> > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users-UqbJ+GOpo4+hPH1hqNUYSQ
public.gmane.org/msg77889.html
>
> thanks, by reading this I see that the maxima buffer must be
> seamlessly integrated wi
Guenter Milde said: (by the date of Fri, 5 Mar 2010 20:07:45 + (UTC))
> One more thing to consider is using the lyxserver pipes. E.g. I wrote
> some experimental "LyX output" for swiginac (a Python wrapper of the
> ginac C++ library, http://swiginac.berlios.de/) using my LyXServer Python
>
On 2010-03-05, Janek Kozicki wrote:
> rgheck said: (by the date of Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:18:35 -0500)
...
> besides improving that communication, the "only" missing thing is to
> be able to declare variables within maxima, and operate on them
> later. It means a running maxima session, instead
rgheck said: (by the date of Fri, 05 Mar 2010 10:18:35 -0500)
> Since I don't use maxima etc myself, I don't have a lot of thoughts
> about this. What happens at present is that LaTeX that is entered into a
> math inset gets translated into maxima's input format; LyX calls maxima
> to do th
On 03/05/2010 10:23 AM, Janek Kozicki wrote:
Liviu Andronic said: (by the date of Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:09:40 +)
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org/msg77889.html
thanks, by reading this I see that the maxima buffer must be
seamlessly integrated with documen
Liviu Andronic said: (by the date of Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:09:40 +)
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org/msg77889.html
thanks, by reading this I see that the maxima buffer must be
seamlessly integrated with document, in order to not confuse people.
But, OTOH, to use an
Liviu Andronic said: (by the date of Fri, 5 Mar 2010 14:09:40 +)
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-us...@lists.lyx.org/msg77889.html
thanks, by reading this I see that the maxima buffer must be
seamlessly integrated with document, in order to not confuse people.
But, OTOH, to use an
On 03/05/2010 09:20 AM, Janek Kozicki wrote:
rgheck said: (by the date of Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:46:39 -0500)
On 03/05/2010 07:29 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
And so on. Apparently, there are many limitations though. Maxima can do
more, the communication between LyX and maxima is limite
rgheck said: (by the date of Fri, 05 Mar 2010 07:46:39 -0500)
> On 03/05/2010 07:29 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
> > And so on. Apparently, there are many limitations though. Maxima can do
> > more, the communication between LyX and maxima is limited. You can't
> > do matrix multiplication, for e
On 3/5/10, Janek Kozicki wrote:
> I don't know what is the current state of lyx+maxima integration, and
> I asked for ML archives in order to check this.
>
Some time ago there was a lengthy discussion about CAS support in LyX
[1] (including Maxima), which also contained some design ideas on
poss
On 03/05/2010 07:29 AM, Helge Hafting wrote:
Janek Kozicki wrote:
[...]
I see now, that such integration would require at least a running
maxima session in the background.
I'm quite experienced with latex and C++.
I am not sure if I decide to go this path, I want to investigate and
judge the di
Janek Kozicki wrote:
[...]
I see now, that such integration would require at least a running
maxima session in the background.
I'm quite experienced with latex and C++.
I am not sure if I decide to go this path, I want to investigate and
judge the difficulty of writing patches that will scrat
Hi,
I'm thinking about the possibility of using lyx as my frontend to
maxima. Texmacs doesn't suit me, because I used gvim+latex for years.
Since I used latex for long time it would be logical to start using
lyx in order to interact with maxima. I didn't ever use lyx before,
because gvim was good
14 matches
Mail list logo
