Re: backporting lyx2lyx to 1.3.6

2005-06-07 Thread Georg Baum
Jose' Matos wrote: > The patch will catch all exceptions during convertions if a given flag > is > given. I suggest also not to change the lyx2lyx version but to pass > directly the 221 format since it is known. The latter is already done. I changed the version because I did not want to annoy

Re: backporting lyx2lyx to 1.3.6

2005-06-07 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 07 June 2005 12:15, Georg Baum wrote: > > Ok, here is the lyx2lyx backport patch. It works for me, and I am going > to commit that tomorrow if nobody says no. The changes to buffer.C will > follow after that. Thanks, I will test the changes to make it more robust. I expect to have a

Re: backporting lyx2lyx to 1.3.6

2005-06-07 Thread Georg Baum
Georg Baum wrote: > That makes sense. However there is one part missing, and I'll add that: > Currently LyX sends only older files through lyx2lyx, but it should also > convert newer files. Ok, here is the lyx2lyx backport patch. It works for me, and I am going to commit that tomorrow if nobody s

Re: backporting lyx2lyx to 1.3.6

2005-06-07 Thread Georg Baum
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > "Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | And why should them be read if they are newer? It was me who motivated > | Lars to do this change. The argument is simple, every knowledge about > | the lyx file format should go into lyx2lyx. > > Yes, that is right.

Re: backporting lyx2lyx to 1.3.6

2005-06-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
"Jose' Matos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Monday 06 June 2005 17:51, Georg Baum wrote: >> I had a look at how files with the wrong version are read in 1.4. It is >> different than in 1.3, newer files are not read at all and not treated as >> if the format was current. The change is here: >> >

Re: backporting lyx2lyx to 1.3.6

2005-06-06 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 06 June 2005 17:51, Georg Baum wrote: > I had a look at how files with the wrong version are read in 1.4. It is > different than in 1.3, newer files are not read at all and not treated as > if the format was current. The change is here: > > http://www.lyx.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lyx-devel

Re: backporting lyx2lyx to 1.3.6

2005-06-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > >> Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> writes: >> >> | I had a look at how files with the wrong version are read in 1.4. It is >> | different than in 1.3, newer files are not read at all and not treated >> | as if the format was

Re: backporting lyx2lyx to 1.3.6

2005-06-06 Thread Georg Baum
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: > > | I had a look at how files with the wrong version are read in 1.4. It is > | different than in 1.3, newer files are not read at all and not treated > | as if the format was current. The change is here: > > I think this wa

Re: backporting lyx2lyx to 1.3.6

2005-06-06 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | I had a look at how files with the wrong version are read in 1.4. It is | different than in 1.3, newer files are not read at all and not treated as | if the format was current. The change is here: I think this was intended, but it would not be intended for

backporting lyx2lyx to 1.3.6

2005-06-06 Thread Georg Baum
I had a look at how files with the wrong version are read in 1.4. It is different than in 1.3, newer files are not read at all and not treated as if the format was current. The change is here: http://www.lyx.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/lyx-devel/src/buffer.C.diff?r1=1.512&r2=1.513 Lars, was that inte