Re: autotools/boost

Am Samstag, den 05.06.2010, 13:45 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Peter Kümmel wrote: > > I'll have a look at the generated Makefile. > > my makefile contains > BOOST_LIBS = $(top_builddir)/boost/liblyxboost.a I found the reason: first I called make in trunk, but seeing all the .po file processing i

Re: autotools/boost

Peter Kümmel wrote: > I'll have a look at the generated Makefile. my makefile contains BOOST_LIBS = $(top_builddir)/boost/liblyxboost.a pavel

Re: autotools/boost

Am Samstag, den 05.06.2010, 13:34 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Peter Kümmel wrote: > > Am Samstag, den 05.06.2010, 12:58 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > > Peter Kümmel wrote: > > > > Is the autotool based buildsystem broken? > > > > It doesn't know how to build ??../boost/liblyxboost.a?? > > > > >

Re: autotools/boost

Peter Kümmel wrote: > Am Samstag, den 05.06.2010, 12:58 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > Peter Kümmel wrote: > > > Is the autotool based buildsystem broken? > > > It doesn't know how to build ??../boost/liblyxboost.a?? > > > > > > I've simply called ./configure without the option > > > --without-in

Re: autotools/boost

Am Samstag, den 05.06.2010, 12:58 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda: > Peter Kümmel wrote: > > Is the autotool based buildsystem broken? > > It doesn't know how to build ??../boost/liblyxboost.a?? > > > > I've simply called ./configure without the option > > --without-included-boost. > > did you start f

Re: autotools/boost

Peter Kümmel wrote: > Is the autotool based buildsystem broken? > It doesn't know how to build ??../boost/liblyxboost.a?? > > I've simply called ./configure without the option > --without-included-boost. did you start from a clean tree? pavel

autotools/boost

Is the autotool based buildsystem broken? It doesn't know how to build »../boost/liblyxboost.a« I've simply called ./configure without the option --without-included-boost. Peter