On 05/07/2013 04:05 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Le 07/05/13 22:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Richard, what about this for 2.0.x?
Yes, that's fine.
rh
Le 07/05/13 22:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes a écrit :
Richard, what about this for 2.0.x?
JMarc
Now with the patches
>From c76a91a23261b0f919838461ce23cadfc5ebb519 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stephan Witt
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 21:17:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] add support for automake 1
Richard, what about this for 2.0.x?
JMarc
Am 21.01.2013 um 12:21 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes :
> Le 06/01/13 20:37, Stephan Witt a écrit :
>> This is the terminal output of automake:
>> Using automake (GNU automake) 1.13.1
>> Using autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69
>> Building macros...
>> Building config header template...
>> Building Makefi
Le 06/01/13 20:37, Stephan Witt a écrit :
This is the terminal output of automake:
Using automake (GNU automake) 1.13.1
Using autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69
Building macros...
Building config header template...
Building Makefile templates...
configure.ac:180: warning: The 'AM_PROG_MKDIR_P' macro is
Le 08/01/13 21:31, Stephan Witt a écrit :
Changing the macro mkdir_p to MKDIR_P would require automake 1.10 - but this is
used already anyway.
Therefor the check in autogen.sh is wrong? Or do I miss something?
We could finally get rid of the included gettext. Who would be impacted?
Personally
Am 06.01.2013 um 20:37 schrieb Stephan Witt :
> Is anyone using automake 1.13 already?
>
> LyX's autogen.sh is ready for 1.12 only.
It's easy to change that. Is it desirable?
> Somehow a shell script named test-driver in the config source directory is
> intro
Is anyone using automake 1.13 already?
LyX's autogen.sh is ready for 1.12 only.
Somehow a shell script named test-driver in the config source directory is
introduced by running automake.
This is the terminal output of automake:
Using automake (GNU automake) 1.13.1
Using autoconf (GNU Aut
