Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> > Please wait a bit until branch is open again (I'm waiting unil we have
> > at least one win32 installer).
>
> ping
go ahead.
Jürgen
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:21:49PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > Jürgen, may I apply the attached patch to allow autoconf 2.68?
> >
> > The change to libtool.m4 simply avoids the innocuous (in our case)
> > warnings which are now issued by AC_LINK_IFELSE if th
Le 18 nov. 10 à 15:22, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
It was much better. Less code to change and less prone to errors.
Good to know.
JMarc
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:28:55AM +0100, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> > Nevertheless, the patch can go in as it is.
>
> Let's see how much work would be following the breakLine() approach.
It was much better. Less code to chan
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:10:45AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 17/11/2010 23:57, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >Anyway, now that I have your attention, what about the newline-in-math
> >patch which is sitting in the pipe? For your convenience, I attach here
> >the last version. I tried
Le 17/11/2010 23:57, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
But since probably nobody uses 2.66, you can do as you prefer :)
As you are the autoconf master, I'll surely do as you suggest :)
:)
Anyway, now that I have your attention, what about the newline-in-math
patch which is sitting in the pipe? F
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:45:02PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 17/11/2010 23:32, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >I also don't see any value in forbidding its usage, given that LyX seems
> >not to be affected by those regressions.
>
> Since it can break AC_CHECK_SIZEOF, we have to be pre
Le 17/11/2010 23:32, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
I also don't see any value in forbidding its usage, given that LyX seems
not to be affected by those regressions.
Since it can break AC_CHECK_SIZEOF, we have to be pretty sure that this
is never called on any platform.
But since probably nobod
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:15:42PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 17/11/2010 18:33, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
> >Well, I remember having used 2.66 without problems but your sharp
> >assertion made me test it again. So, I reinstalled 2.66 and tried
> >it on both branch and trunk: no probl
Le 17/11/2010 18:33, Enrico Forestieri a écrit :
Well, I remember having used 2.66 without problems but your sharp
assertion made me test it again. So, I reinstalled 2.66 and tried
it on both branch and trunk: no problem whatsoever.
I was simply assuming that nobody had actually tried 2.66 and i
Am 17.11.2010 um 18:40 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:21:49PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>>
>>> Jürgen, may I apply the attached patch to allow autoconf 2.68?
>>>
>>> The change to libtool.m4 simply avoids the innocuous (in our case)
>>>
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:21:49PM +0100, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Enrico Forestieri wrote:
>
> > Jürgen, may I apply the attached patch to allow autoconf 2.68?
> >
> > The change to libtool.m4 simply avoids the innocuous (in our case)
> > warnings which are now issued by AC_LINK_IFELSE if the
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 04:48:14PM +0100, Kornel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2010 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:17:55PM +0100, Kornel wrote:
> > > Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2010 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > > > Jürgen, may I apply the attached patch to allow aut
Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2010 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:17:55PM +0100, Kornel wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2010 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > > Jürgen, may I apply the attached patch to allow autoconf 2.68?
> > >
> > > The change to libtool.m4 simply avoids
Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> Jürgen, may I apply the attached patch to allow autoconf 2.68?
>
> The change to libtool.m4 simply avoids the innocuous (in our case)
> warnings which are now issued by AC_LINK_IFELSE if the first argument
> is not conforming.
> See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/aut
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 02:17:55PM +0100, Kornel wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2010 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> > Jürgen, may I apply the attached patch to allow autoconf 2.68?
> >
> > The change to libtool.m4 simply avoids the innocuous (in our case)
> > warnings which are now issued by AC_
Am Mittwoch, 17. November 2010 schrieb Enrico Forestieri:
> Jürgen, may I apply the attached patch to allow autoconf 2.68?
>
> The change to libtool.m4 simply avoids the innocuous (in our case)
> warnings which are now issued by AC_LINK_IFELSE if the first argument
> is not conforming.
> See http:
Jürgen, may I apply the attached patch to allow autoconf 2.68?
The change to libtool.m4 simply avoids the innocuous (in our case)
warnings which are now issued by AC_LINK_IFELSE if the first argument
is not conforming.
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf/2010-09/msg00069.html
I tested
18 matches
Mail list logo
