Pavel Sanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I have restarted spamd a couple of times these last days. But this is not
>> what I see now.
>
> do you have times of these restarts so i can compare with load graph?
Sorry, not really. I was in a hurry at the time and did not write
anything down (as I a
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> unfortunately it doesn't look like that (i observed slowdowns in last
>> period
>> and before few days i started monitoring via my script again...)
>> i have been silent and waiting for berlin since to discuss aussie setup
>> through mails is lengthy and painful.
>
>
unfortunately it doesn't look like that (i observed slowdowns in
last period
and before few days i started monitoring via my script again...)
i have been silent and waiting for berlin since to discuss aussie
setup
through mails is lengthy and painful.
I have restarted spamd a couple of time
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>
> Le 11 nov. 08 ? 15:44, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
>
>> Some process needs to be killed I guess:
>>
>
> I am not sure. I suspect it is just lots of people on the site... Right now
> there is no process that remains high.
unfortunately it doesn't look like that (i ob
Le 11 nov. 08 à 15:44, Abdelrazak Younes a écrit :
Some process needs to be killed I guess:
I am not sure. I suspect it is just lots of people on the site...
Right now
there is no process that remains high.
JMarc
Some process needs to be killed I guess:
top - 15:43:11 up 113 days, 21:54, 1 user, load average: 7.95, 10.14, 8.84
Tasks: 155 total, 4 running, 151 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 33.1% us, 4.0% sy, 0.0% ni, 57.9% id, 4.6% wa, 0.3% hi, 0.0% si
Mem:255612k total, 202204k
