On Mar 20, 2011, at 6:11 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jens Nöckel wrote:
>>> I believe aqua.bind was an attempt to imitate Linux's ability to
>>> access the menus from the keyboard (albeit without the menus dropping
>>> down), whereas I know that mac.bind was desi
Jens Nöckel wrote:
> > I believe aqua.bind was an attempt to imitate Linux's ability to
> > access the menus from the keyboard (albeit without the menus dropping
> > down), whereas I know that mac.bind was designed to adhere to Mac
> > standards as closely as p
On Mar 20, 2011, at 3:56 PM, BH wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> mac people,
>> what is the relation between mac.bind and aqua.bind. do we need both of them?
>> pavel
>
> I believe aqua.bind was an attempt to imitate Linux's abilit
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> mac people,
> what is the relation between mac.bind and aqua.bind. do we need both of them?
> pavel
I believe aqua.bind was an attempt to imitate Linux's ability to
access the menus from the keyboard (albeit without the menus
mac people,
what is the relation between mac.bind and aqua.bind. do we need both of them?
pavel
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
Michael> I am not convinced. Before, view source was enabled if buf
Michael> was set. Now, AFAICS view-source is always enabled. Have I
Michael> overlooked anything?
Did you try it out? The logic is in the first test:
if (!buf)
enable = name
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> I am not convinced. Before, view source was enabled if buf
Michael> was set. Now, AFAICS view-source is always enabled. Have I
Michael> overlooked anything?
Did you try it out? The logic is in the first test:
if (!buf)
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes schrieb:
"Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Why did you remove view-source?
Look at the logic. This case was already covered as far as I know.
I am not convinced. Before, view source was enabled if buf was set. Now,
AFAICS vie
> "Michael" == Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Michael> Why did you remove view-source?
Look at the logic. This case was already covered as far as I know.
JMarc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Author: lasgouttes
Date: Mon Apr 23 11:35:28 2007
New Revision: 17915
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/17915
Log:
remove outdated "status" file
Modified: lyx-devel/trunk/src/lyxfunc.C
URL: http://www.lyx.org/trac/file/lyx-devel/trunk/src/lyxfunc.C?rev=17915
> "Jean-Marc" == Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Marc> This part of the commit was not intended to go in now, but
Jean-Marc> it is OK. This is the partial fix to bug 2208 I posted
Jean-Marc> earlier.
Actually, 2208 is another spellchecker bug. This one is 3283
JMarc
uot;status" file
lasgouttes> Removed: lyx-devel/trunk/status
lasgouttes> Modified:
lasgouttes> lyx-devel/trunk/lib/bind/aqua.bind
lasgouttes> lyx-devel/trunk/src/lyxfunc.C
This part of the commit was not intended to go in now, but it is OK.
This is the partial fix to bug 2208 I posted earlier.
JMarc
12 matches
Mail list logo
