Pavel Sanda wrote:
> this shouldn't easyfix for some newcomer dev... ;)
should be
>
> pavel
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> this noop lfun could generalized so different environment could be added as
> argument
> one argument for negation and we have quite powerful hacking machinery without
> touching additional code at all ;)
or less trickier:
LFUN_CONTEXT_TRIGGER [!] ENVI_TYPE LFUN_CALL
this sh
zhaoyunsong wrote:
> I am writting to ask if I can define shortcuts that works only in math mode.
no. but there has been already such request.
hmm thinking more, we have command-alternative, which ends up in the first
successfull lfun. so now only some noop lfun returning true in standard
en
