José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 18 May 2007 10:18:17 am Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> Nice to hear. Do you use the merge option to speed up compilation?
>
> I am considering it.
> This blog entry made me curious: C++ noodling, http://tromey.com/blog/?p=352
>
Yes you could assume a speed up of 4-5 by swit
Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 01:38:39PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
>> On Friday 18 May 2007 10:18:17 am Peter Kümmel wrote:
>>> Nice to hear. Do you use the merge option to speed up compilation?
>> I am considering it.
>> This blog entry made me curious: C++ noodling, http://tromey.
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 01:38:39PM +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 18 May 2007 10:18:17 am Peter Kümmel wrote:
> > Nice to hear. Do you use the merge option to speed up compilation?
>
> I am considering it.
> This blog entry made me curious: C++ noodling, http://tromey.com/blog/?p=352
I earl
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 08:36:03AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
> [...]
> The same comment applies to floatCB.
In the long term I'd like to see this suffix changed.
It's always 'CB?' - 'CallBack!' - 'no, combobox?' - 'or checkbox?'
- 'or checkbutton?'
Andre'
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 09:15:52PM -0500, Bo Peng wrote:
> @@ -103,7 +105,7 @@
> string language = fromqstr(languageCO->currentText());
>
> bool float_ = floatCB->checkState() == Qt::Checked;
> - string placement = fromqstr(placementLE->text());
> + string placement = pla
Richard Heck wrote:
> Or maybe even on the way to 1.5.1?
Depends on how it looks like.
Jürgen
Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
José Matos wrote:
3637 is attached. (Get label from parameter string and push to
label list).
Jürgen is this OK with you?
Hm, I missed this and did something similar. Bo's patch is generally
better, but lacks changeRefsIfUnique.
I propose t
Bo Peng wrote:
You could use the automatic slots and avoid the connect() below and also
avoid the test for isChecked() as the state is given:
Thanks. Never know something like this.
I said these qt bugs would be handled by you GUI guys in a more
efficient and elegant way.
Not enough time sor
You could use the automatic slots and avoid the connect() below and also
avoid the test for isChecked() as the state is given:
Thanks. Never know something like this.
I said these qt bugs would be handled by you GUI guys in a more
efficient and elegant way.
I am wondering if you should not do
On Friday 18 May 2007 4:06:27 pm Bo Peng wrote:
> For documentation, I suggest that you submit and report here which
> parts have been updated. Patches for lyx files can be hard to
> decipher.
+1
> Bo
--
José Abílio
OK. I expect some more documentation changes from Ignacio and Hartmut and
probably also me. Should I
sned them also to the list.
For documentation, I suggest that you submit and report here which
parts have been updated. Patches for lyx files can be hard to
decipher.
Bo
> Uwe just created the 20th bug report for the listings stuff
Wow, I wasn't aware that I complained so much ;-).
But that's why I sometimes request on the list that the developer who built in a new feature also
writes the documentation. I found all the bugs by doing this.
I previously worked wi
This string params encoding/decoding is really horrible (not your fault,
nothing we can change now).
This can be changed easily by storing strcutured parameters
(dict) instead of latex-valid strings. I think this
will improve the searching and handling a bit.
I will do that later.
Bo
On Friday 18 May 2007 3:18:46 pm Bo Peng wrote:
> Yes. Please put Jurgen's second version in.
OK. Jürgen you clearance to take off. ;-)
> Bo
--
José Abílio
Now I ask the other way around, Bo is this OK with you. ;-)
Yes. Please put Jurgen's second version in.
Bo
On Friday 18 May 2007 10:18:17 am Peter Kümmel wrote:
> Nice to hear. Do you use the merge option to speed up compilation?
I am considering it.
This blog entry made me curious: C++ noodling, http://tromey.com/blog/?p=352
--
José Abílio
On Fri, 18 May 2007, José Matos wrote:
Just to remember the list of current lyx bugs rated by severity is
in the wiki, http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/BuglistsForLyX150
Very nice page, better than using bugzilla directly.
Actually what Christian has done can be done with bugzilla, I have
querie
On Friday 18 May 2007 10:50:47 am Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Hm, I missed this and did something similar. Bo's patch is generally
> better, but lacks changeRefsIfUnique.
>
> I propose to put in the attached (which is a synthesis of Bo's and my
> patch).
>
> Jürgen
Now I ask the other way around
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
José Matos wrote:
3637 is attached. (Get label from parameter string and push to label
list).
Jürgen is this OK with you?
Hm, I missed this and did something similar. Bo's patch is generally better,
but lacks changeRefsIfUnique.
I propose to put in the attached
José Matos wrote:
> > 3637 is attached. (Get label from parameter string and push to label
> > list).
>
> Jürgen is this OK with you?
Hm, I missed this and did something similar. Bo's patch is generally better,
but lacks changeRefsIfUnique.
I propose to put in the attached (which is a synthesi
José Matos wrote:
> On Friday 18 May 2007 7:47:29 am Peter Kümmel wrote:
>> José Matos wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> a common share of LyX release managers is that we have the memory and
>>> span attention of a gold fish (I could cite Lars on this subject). ;-)
>>>
>>> If you have bugfixes that you li
On Friday 18 May 2007 4:07:58 am Bo Peng wrote:
> 3637 is attached. (Get label from parameter string and push to label list).
Jürgen is this OK with you?
> Bo
--
José Abílio
On Friday 18 May 2007 7:47:29 am Peter Kümmel wrote:
> José Matos wrote:
> > Hi,
> > a common share of LyX release managers is that we have the memory and
> > span attention of a gold fish (I could cite Lars on this subject). ;-)
> >
> > If you have bugfixes that you like me to consider for
On Friday 18 May 2007 3:31:04 am Bo Peng wrote:
> > Attached is the first one, for bug 3642. OK to go in?
>
> Here is the second one, for bug 3638. OK?
>
> Index: src/frontends/qt4/ui/IncludeUi.ui
> ===
> --- src/frontends/qt4/ui/Inclu
On Friday 18 May 2007 3:15:52 am Bo Peng wrote:
> > If you have bugfixes that you like me to consider for inclusion
> > please reply here. I will appreciate those with bugzilla numbers
> > associated. :-)
>
> Uwe just created the 20th bug report for the listings stuff, so there
> will be so
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Fri, 18 May 2007, Peter Kümmel wrote:
>
>> Bo Peng wrote:
If you have bugfixes that you like me to consider for
inclusion please reply
here. I will appreciate those with bugzilla numbers associated. :-)
>>>
>>> Uwe just created the 20th bug repo
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
If you have bugfixes that you like me to consider for
inclusion please reply
here. I will appreciate those with bugzilla numbers associated. :-)
Uwe just created the 20th bug report for the listings stuff, so there
They are not
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Peter Kümmel wrote:
Just to remember the list of current lyx bugs rated by severity is
in the wiki, http://wiki.lyx.org/Devel/BuglistsForLyX150
Very nice page, better than using bugzilla directly.
Thanks. Let me know if you think of improvements.
/Christian
--
Christi
Bo Peng wrote:
>> If you have bugfixes that you like me to consider for
>> inclusion please reply
>> here. I will appreciate those with bugzilla numbers associated. :-)
>
> Uwe just created the 20th bug report for the listings stuff, so there
They are not on the Wiki page!
http://wiki.lyx
José Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> a common share of LyX release managers is that we have the memory and
> span
> attention of a gold fish (I could cite Lars on this subject). ;-)
>
> If you have bugfixes that you like me to consider for inclusion please
> reply
> here. I will appreciate th
Bo Peng wrote:
Index: src/frontends/qt4/QListings.h
===
--- src/frontends/qt4/QListings.h (revision 18385)
+++ src/frontends/qt4/QListings.h (working copy)
@@ -34,6 +34,10 @@
/// AFAIK, QValidator only works for QLineE
I'm working on a patch that addresses several problems with the
converters. This will hopefully address bugs 643, 2807, and 3047. I
should be sending to the list shortly.
José Matos wrote:
> Hi,
> a common share of LyX release managers is that we have the memory and
> span
> attention of
Here is the second one, for bug 3638. OK?
3637 is attached. (Get label from parameter string and push to label list).
Bo
Index: src/insets/InsetListingsParams.h
===
--- src/insets/InsetListingsParams.h (revision 18385)
+++ src/inse
Attached is the first one, for bug 3642. OK to go in?
Here is the second one, for bug 3638. OK?
Index: src/frontends/qt4/ui/IncludeUi.ui
===
--- src/frontends/qt4/ui/IncludeUi.ui (revision 18385)
+++ src/frontends/qt4/ui/IncludeU
If you have bugfixes that you like me to consider for inclusion please
reply
here. I will appreciate those with bugzilla numbers associated. :-)
Uwe just created the 20th bug report for the listings stuff, so there
will be some small patches Actually, I knew some of the problems
but
Hi,
a common share of LyX release managers is that we have the memory and
span
attention of a gold fish (I could cite Lars on this subject). ;-)
If you have bugfixes that you like me to consider for inclusion please
reply
here. I will appreciate those with bugzilla numbers asso
36 matches
Mail list logo
