Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

Am So., 12. März 2023 um 09:59 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > Am So., 12. März 2023 um 03:37 Uhr schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier: > >> On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 03:25, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> >>> On 3/11/23 20:18, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 01:44, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >>

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

Am So., 12. März 2023 um 01:43 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > On 3/11/23 03:22, Yu Jin wrote: > > Am Sa., 11. März 2023 um 08:31 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin: > >> Am Sa., 11. März 2023 um 07:09 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: >> >>> On 3/10/23 17:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >>> > Le 10/03/2023

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

Am So., 12. März 2023 um 03:37 Uhr schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier: > On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 03:25, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > >> On 3/11/23 20:18, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: >> >> On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 01:44, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> >>> On 3/11/23 03:22, Yu Jin wrote: >>> >> So what would you

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 03:25, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 3/11/23 20:18, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: > > On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 01:44, Richard Kimberly Heck > wrote: > >> On 3/11/23 03:22, Yu Jin wrote: >> > So what would you say? Is pywin32 needed or do I skip it? >> >> Did you see my message

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

On 3/11/23 20:18, Thibaut Cuvelier wrote: On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 01:44, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 3/11/23 03:22, Yu Jin wrote: So what would you say? Is pywin32 needed or do I skip it? Did you see my message about what this is supposed to do? Suppress certain windows

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 at 01:44, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 3/11/23 03:22, Yu Jin wrote: > > 2. The python package gets significantly larger (50MB vs 18MB unzipped) > and also the LyX installer itself when finished (65MB vs. 55MB). > > Not a big deal either. > LyX will still be far from Elect

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

On 3/11/23 03:22, Yu Jin wrote: Am Sa., 11. März 2023 um 08:31 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin: Am Sa., 11. März 2023 um 07:09 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: On 3/10/23 17:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 10/03/2023 à 22:21, Yu Jin a écrit : >> all the win* imports from l

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

Am Sa., 11. März 2023 um 08:31 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin: > Am Sa., 11. März 2023 um 07:09 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > >> On 3/10/23 17:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> > Le 10/03/2023 à 22:21, Yu Jin a écrit : >> >> all the win* imports from lyxpreview_tools.py fail, but those are in >> >> a

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

Am Sa., 11. März 2023 um 07:09 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@gmail.com>: > On 3/10/23 17:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > Le 10/03/2023 à 22:21, Yu Jin a écrit : > >> all the win* imports from lyxpreview_tools.py fail, but those are in > >> a try-except block > > > > What do we g

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

On 3/10/23 17:04, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Le 10/03/2023 à 22:21, Yu Jin a écrit : all the win* imports from lyxpreview_tools.py fail, but those are in a try-except block What do we gain when they ar present? It might be important enough to warrant having those modules.     try:    

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

Le 10/03/2023 à 22:21, Yu Jin a écrit : all the win* imports from lyxpreview_tools.py fail, but those are in a try-except block What do we gain when they ar present? It might be important enough to warrant having those modules. prefs2prefs imports also fail, but looks like prefs2prefs.py is

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

Am Mi., 8. März 2023 um 14:49 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda: > > Another approach could be just collect all import lines from > all scripts in lib/scripts and check they are within that minimal > p3 install. > This sounds like a good idea, I just did that, there are quite a few imports: import os, re,

Re: Include Python3 in the Windows installer

On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 10:11:57PM +0100, Yu Jin wrote: > I am probably a bit late on this, but Python2 like does not exist anymore, > so I am thinking on including python 3 in the installer. I have looked at > the download page for python and found Windows embeddable package (64-bit), > which is 8

Include Python3 in the Windows installer

I am probably a bit late on this, but Python2 like does not exist anymore, so I am thinking on including python 3 in the installer. I have looked at the download page for python and found Windows embeddable package (64-bit), which is 8-10 MB small (depending on the version), I have looked into that

Re: Windows installer: add version in all shortcuts

Am Do., 11. Feb. 2021 um 23:01 Uhr schrieb Thibaut Cuvelier < dourou...@gmail.com>: > Hi Eugene, > > I proposed in another discussion to add the version in all shortcuts > created by the installer, for specifically the case where the user has > several versions of LyX (or just updated, in which ca

Windows installer: add version in all shortcuts

Hi Eugene, I proposed in another discussion to add the version in all shortcuts created by the installer, for specifically the case where the user has several versions of LyX (or just updated, in which case there will be a delay before the new shortcut gets into the search cache of the Start menu)

LyX 2.3.6 Windows Installer

As noted in the announcement of LyX 2.3.6, there is now an updated installer available for Windows, including a 64 bit version. In order to update to 2.3.6 on Windows using the new installer, you should uninstall the previous 2.3 releases using the uninstaller or from within the control panel/Windo

Re: Windows Installer to Test

On 6/3/20 9:50 AM, Yu Jin wrote: > Am Mi., 3. Juni 2020 um 04:03 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: > > I've put the Windows installer for 2.3.5 here > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ > > for testing. Please let

Re: Windows Installer to Test

Am Mi., 3. Juni 2020 um 04:03 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > I've put the Windows installer for 2.3.5 here > > http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ > > for testing. Please let me know if there are any issues. I am hoping to > release Th

Windows Installer to Test

I've put the Windows installer for 2.3.5 here http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ for testing. Please let me know if there are any issues. I am hoping to release Thursday. Note that there will also be installers built from Eugene's new code, but these will not be posted unti

Re: Work on Windows installer

On Mon, Jun 01, 2020 at 12:02:41PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > > Nice work! I'm going to build the 2.3.5 tarball probably today. I'll use > the old installer for the official one, but we can release 'testing' > installers built from this code, as well (including the 64 bit binary). > We

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mo., 1. Juni 2020 um 15:43 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko : > Instead of changing strings, it should be possible to change the handling > of > the translatable strings (e.g. replace "\r\n" to "$\r$\n" on the fly) > Makes sense, why did I not think about that. I have done that now and replaced th

Re: Work on Windows installer

Nice work! I'm going to build the 2.3.5 tarball probably today. I'll use the old installer for the official one, but we can release 'testing' installers built from this code, as well (including the 64 bit binary). We can advertise those just on the lists, as we did the last time. That should get u

Re: Work on Windows installer

On 6/1/20 11:23 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 01/06/2020 à 17:19, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : >> Am Montag, den 01.06.2020, 15:43 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: >>> The position of these files could be >>> development/Win32/packaging/installerCommon/lang/*.nsh >>> to be used by both i

Re: Work on Windows installer

On 6/1/20 9:43 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Mon, 1 Jun 2020 14:56:47 +0200 > schrieb Yu Jin : > >> Am Mo., 1. Juni 2020 um 14:01 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko :0 >> >>> From what I can see, the patch adds only Windows install in extra dir. >>> >>> The duplication of language-files >>> developmen

Re: Work on Windows installer

Le 01/06/2020 à 17:19, Jürgen Spitzmüller a écrit : Am Montag, den 01.06.2020, 15:43 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: The position of these files could be development/Win32/packaging/installerCommon/lang/*.nsh to be used by both installers. I understand the old installer will we ditched an

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Montag, den 01.06.2020, 15:43 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > The position of these files could be > development/Win32/packaging/installerCommon/lang/*.nsh > to be used by both installers. I understand the old installer will we ditched anyway after the new one has been sufficiently tested

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mon, 1 Jun 2020 14:56:47 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin : > Am Mo., 1. Juni 2020 um 14:01 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko :0 > > > From what I can see, the patch adds only Windows install in extra dir. > > > > The duplication of language-files > > development/Win32/packaging/installer2/src/lang/*.nsh >

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mo., 1. Juni 2020 um 14:01 Uhr schrieb Kornel Benko :0 > From what I can see, the patch adds only Windows install in extra dir. > > The duplication of language-files > development/Win32/packaging/installer2/src/lang/*.nsh > vs > development/Win32/packaging/installer/lang/*.nsh >

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mon, 01 Jun 2020 13:36:51 +0200 schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Montag, den 01.06.2020, 12:40 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > > > Track also has a size limit, though (2 MB per attachment). > > > > Ticked created #11882 > > Thanks. I suspect there are not many (are there any?) people who feel >

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Montag, den 01.06.2020, 12:40 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > > Track also has a size limit, though (2 MB per attachment). > > Ticked created #11882 Thanks. I suspect there are not many (are there any?) people who feel competent to comment on this. I propose to go ahead and commit to master so it can

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mo., 1. Juni 2020 um 10:16 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Montag, den 01.06.2020, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > > What if I create a Ticket on track and upload it there? > > Track also has a size limit, though (2 MB per attachment). > Ticked created #11882

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Montag, den 01.06.2020, 10:13 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > What if I create a Ticket on track and upload it there? Track also has a size limit, though (2 MB per attachment). Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.or

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mo., 1. Juni 2020 um 08:56 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 09:38 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > > I think I'm finished with the new installer... I have tested a few > > obvious cases and how the installer behaves there makes sense imho. > > How do I best share my work? T

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Samstag, den 30.05.2020, 09:38 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > I think I'm finished with the new installer... I have tested a few > obvious cases and how the installer behaves there makes sense imho. > How do I best share my work? The patch would have a couple of > thousands lines, I think there was a l

Re: Work on Windows installer

I think I'm finished with the new installer... I have tested a few obvious cases and how the installer behaves there makes sense imho. How do I best share my work? The patch would have a couple of thousands lines, I think there was a limit in the mailing list? Eugene -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx

Re: Work on Windows installer

A quick update on this. So far I have made good progress imo, some things are finished already, I will list the big ones now: 1. The whole installer UI including the LatexFolder page, which I have recreated with NSIS dialog designer. 2. Code for searching latex distribution, which is related to the

Re: Work on Windows installer

N Sanskrit > se_NO North Sami > syr_SY Syriac > zh_CN Chinese (simplified) > zh_TW Chinese (traditional) > > Should I skip these then? > > There are also 3 hunspell and 1 thesaurus dictionaries in lyxsvn, whose > corresponding languages are not supported in LyX, I will comment them

Re: Work on Windows installer

onding languages are not supported in LyX, I will comment them out in the Windows installer for now: hunspell: fo_FO (Faroese) ht_HT (Haitian Creole) ku_TR (kurdo) not sure what this one is though as there is no entry in https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_language_names thesaurus: ne_NP (

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Freitag, den 15.05.2020, 18:56 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > There are more dictionaries available in lyxsvn than defined in the > Windows installer. I have searched the web for a sorted list of > language names in their native form, but didn't find any. How do you > usually get nat

Re: Work on Windows installer

There are more dictionaries available in lyxsvn than defined in the Windows installer. I have searched the web for a sorted list of language names in their native form, but didn't find any. How do you usually get native names and how do you sort them? (Well I could get the unsorted names,

Re: Work on Windows installer

Le 13/05/2020 à 13:04, Pavel Sanda a écrit : - Any major rewrite better be finished before we start releasing 2.4 betas so it gets proper testing. JMarc did not share any release plans yet, but my sense is we are talking about couple months(?). My plan has always been clear: release an al

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mi., 13. Mai 2020 um 18:58 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > On 5/13/20 7:04 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Thanks for sharing all these thoughts. > > Let me add my thanks, too. This is all old code and a bit of a mess, so > it certainly could use a re-write. > > > > If you c

Re: Work on Windows installer

On 5/13/20 7:04 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 07:30:51AM +0200, Yu Jin wrote: >> 1. I could rewrite everything that I think is doable in a much better way, >> this would mean actually creating a new installer, then checking the old >> one function by function and then deciding wh

Re: Work on Windows installer

On 5/13/20 3:14 AM, Yu Jin wrote: > Am Mi., 13. Mai 2020 um 07:47 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > mailto:sp...@lyx.org>>: > > Generally, having well documented and readable code is a good thing. A > non-well written installer distracts developers and is bug prone. So > I'd second your

Re: Work on Windows installer

On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 07:30:51AM +0200, Yu Jin wrote: > 1. I could rewrite everything that I think is doable in a much better way, > this would mean actually creating a new installer, then checking the old > one function by function and then deciding which to rewarite and which to > adopt. This w

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mi., 13. Mai 2020 um 07:47 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Generally, having well documented and readable code is a good thing. A > non-well written installer distracts developers and is bug prone. So > I'd second your preference. Having written this, it seems most > important to me that the

Re: Work on Windows installer

Am Mittwoch, den 13.05.2020, 07:30 +0200 schrieb Yu Jin: > 1. I could rewrite everything that I think is doable in a much better > way, this would mean actually creating a new installer, then checking > the old one function by function and then deciding which to rewarite > and which to adopt. This

Work on Windows installer

Ive been studying the code for windows installer and understand it pretty well now. However the more I understand it, the more I find it hardly readable and not intuitive. There are many little things that can be made more elegant, but also the whole setup of the files and how they are structured

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

Am So., 5. Apr. 2020 um 01:23 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > On 3/27/20 2:23 PM, Yu Jin wrote: > > Am Fr., 27. März 2020 um 19:04 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < > rikih...@lyx.org>: > >> On 3/23/20 1:49 PM, Yu Jin wrote: >> >> Here is another patch, I updated the des

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

On 3/27/20 2:23 PM, Yu Jin wrote: > Am Fr., 27. März 2020 um 19:04 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: > > On 3/23/20 1:49 PM, Yu Jin wrote: >> Here is another patch, I updated the description of DTL update, >> because the newer version does not work with mikt

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

ta 0001-implemented-64-bit-installer-removed-registry-hackin.patch Description: Binary data 0004-updatelog-master.patch Description: Binary data 0002-changed-main-registry-entry-LyX-Version-now-added-la.patch Description: Binary data 0006-DTL-update-is-not-usable.patch Description: Bina

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

On 3/23/20 1:49 PM, Yu Jin wrote: > Am Fr., 20. März 2020 um 21:05 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin > mailto:technikma...@gmail.com>>: > > Am Fr., 20. März 2020 um 20:16 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > mailto:rikih...@lyx.org>>: > > I will do so by the end of the weekend. The main question is

Re: 64-bit windows installer

arsloe mailto:ajpars...@gmail.com>>: I've downloaded and installed the 64-bit windows installer. No problems with the installation. But the first trial document I tried triggered an error. If there is a preview to be formed (e.g. a math inset with

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

Am Fr., 20. März 2020 um 21:05 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > Am Fr., 20. März 2020 um 20:16 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < > rikih...@lyx.org>: > >> I will do so by the end of the weekend. The main question is whether >> these will affect my 2.3.x builds in any way. > > You would have to change the

Re: 64-bit windows installer

mail.com>>: >> >> I've downloaded and installed the 64-bit windows installer. >> No problems >> with the installation. But the first trial document I tried >> triggered an >> error. If there is a preview to be form

Re: 64-bit windows installer

Am Mo., 23. März 2020 um 09:29 Uhr schrieb Andrew Parsloe < ajpars...@gmail.com>: > On 23/03/2020 8:53 pm, Yu Jin wrote: > > Am Mo., 23. März 2020 um 02:44 Uhr schrieb Andrew Parsloe < > ajpars...@gmail.com>: > >> I've downloaded and installed the 64-bit wind

Re: 64-bit windows installer

Am Mo., 23. März 2020 um 02:44 Uhr schrieb Andrew Parsloe < ajpars...@gmail.com>: > I've downloaded and installed the 64-bit windows installer. No problems > with the installation. But the first trial document I tried triggered an > error. If there is a preview to be forme

64-bit windows installer

I've downloaded and installed the 64-bit windows installer. No problems with the installation. But the first trial document I tried triggered an error. If there is a preview to be formed (e.g. a math inset with preview on), I get the error: "dv2dt.exe System Error. kpathsea631.dl

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

Am Fr., 20. März 2020 um 20:16 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > On 3/20/20 1:47 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:26:16AM +0100, Yu Jin wrote: > >>> I have created a batch file, which deletes the redundant files. I have > >>> decided to delete convert.ex

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

On 3/20/20 1:47 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:26:16AM +0100, Yu Jin wrote: >>> I have created a batch file, which deletes the redundant files. I have >>> decided to delete convert.exe and leave magick.exe, because it aligns with >>> the installed version of imagemagick and wit

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:26:16AM +0100, Yu Jin wrote: > > I have created a batch file, which deletes the redundant files. I have > > decided to delete convert.exe and leave magick.exe, because it aligns with > > the installed version of imagemagick and with what was shipped with LyX > > until now

Re: LyX 2.3.5dev Windows Installer for Testing

gt; > > > > >> Le 16/03/2020 à 04:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : > > >>> I've uploaded a Windows installer built from the stable development > > >>> branch, as of about a week ago, here: > > >>> > > >>> http:

Re: LyX 2.3.5dev Windows Installer for Testing

Am Wed, 18 Mar 2020 20:13:51 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 18/03/2020 à 20:02, Kornel Benko a écrit : > > Am Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:38:53 +0100 > > schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > > >> Le 16/03/2020 à 04:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : > >

Re: LyX 2.3.5dev Windows Installer for Testing

Le 18/03/2020 à 20:02, Kornel Benko a écrit : Am Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:38:53 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : Le 16/03/2020 à 04:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : I've uploaded a Windows installer built from the stable development branch, as of about a week ago, here: http://ftp.ly

Re: LyX 2.3.5dev Windows Installer for Testing

Am Wed, 18 Mar 2020 19:38:53 +0100 schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > Le 16/03/2020 à 04:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : > > I've uploaded a Windows installer built from the stable development > > branch, as of about a week ago, here: > > > > http://ftp.lyx.org

Re: LyX 2.3.5dev Windows Installer for Testing

Le 16/03/2020 à 04:48, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : I've uploaded a Windows installer built from the stable development branch, as of about a week ago, here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ I think I am missing something: I see the sources, but where are the installers?

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

Am Di., 10. März 2020 um 08:18 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > Am Mo., 9. März 2020 um 11:54 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda : > >> By scriptable I meant to have some kind of (shell?) script, which converts >> the downloaded imagemagick to the one which is distributed by us, >> if we make any changes to it. This w

Re: LyX 2.3.5dev Windows Installer for Testing

On 3/16/20 12:39 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 11:48:29PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> Please let us know if you encounter any issues. It would also be good >> just to let us know if you are using this installer, just so we know >> that actual testing is being done. > P

Re: LyX 2.3.5dev Windows Installer for Testing

On Sun, Mar 15, 2020 at 11:48:29PM -0400, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > Please let us know if you encounter any issues. It would also be good > just to let us know if you are using this installer, just so we know > that actual testing is being done. Perhaps it should go to users list as well? Pav

LyX 2.3.5dev Windows Installer for Testing

I've uploaded a Windows installer built from the stable development branch, as of about a week ago, here: http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ Note that these are best used by experienced users. They should be fairly stable, but the whole point of uploading them is to try to avoid the

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

Am Mo., 9. März 2020 um 11:54 Uhr schrieb Pavel Sanda : > By scriptable I meant to have some kind of (shell?) script, which converts > the downloaded imagemagick to the one which is distributed by us, > if we make any changes to it. This would have two advatages: > 1. We are going to update imagem

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

t; Scriptable... Im not sure how you mean that, I dont know much about > imagemagick, which files it really needs... there are lots of xml files... > maybe imagemagick devs change something in the future. I planned to > describe it as good as possible in the README for the windows installe

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

ene 0001-description-for-windows-installer-and-dependencies.patch Description: Binary data -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

Am So., 8. März 2020 um 14:26 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > Here is the first patch, I fixed some nsis errors I got, added code for a > 64 bit installer and removed the registry hacking for imagemagick. > This is meant for both master and 2.3.x > > @Riki, I also uploaded the updated dependencies (contain

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

Am Sa., 7. März 2020 um 09:11 Uhr schrieb Yu Jin : > So as far as I can see I should do following: > First update the dependencies with the portable imagemagick. > For stable: remove the registry writing part for imagemagick. > For master change the main registry key from "...\LyX${APP_VERSION}" t

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

gemagick, which files it really needs... there are lots of xml files... maybe imagemagick devs change something in the future. I planned to describe it as good as possible in the README for the windows installer, but I think a person would have to do it manually following the guide. > Isn't ghost

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

Am 07.03.2020 um 07:30 schrieb Daniel : > > On 2020-03-06 22:06, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> On 3/6/20 3:24 PM, Daniel wrote: >>> On 2020-03-06 19:53, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: There is something I have always wondered here, but never really understood. Why do WE end to install Im

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

On 2020-03-06 22:06, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: On 3/6/20 3:24 PM, Daniel wrote: On 2020-03-06 19:53, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: There is something I have always wondered here, but never really understood. Why do WE end to install ImageMagick? Why can't we just have the user install it, lik

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

Le 6 mars 2020 18:53:07 GMT+00:00, Richard Kimberly Heck a écrit : >There is something I have always wondered here, but never really >understood. Why do WE end to install ImageMagick? Why can't we just >have >the user install it, like we do on other platforms, and then detect it >via the regist

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

On 3/6/20 3:24 PM, Daniel wrote: > On 2020-03-06 19:53, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: >> There is something I have always wondered here, but never really >> understood. Why do WE end to install ImageMagick? Why can't we just >> have the user install it, like we do on other platforms, and then >> det

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

On 2020-03-06 19:53, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: There is something I have always wondered here, but never really understood. Why do WE end to install ImageMagick? Why can't we just have the user install it, like we do on other platforms, and then detect it via the registry, if that's what we

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

On 3/6/20 5:21 AM, Yu Jin wrote: > Am Fr., 6. März 2020 um 10:21 Uhr schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > mailto:lasgout...@lyx.org>>: > > What I would propose for this kind of problem is to bundle a portable > version of imagemagick with LyX. I would expect that this does not > require regis

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

On 3/6/20 4:21 AM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 06/03/2020 à 09:08, Yu Jin a écrit : >> Hi all, >> I've been training nsis and experimenting with the windows installer. >> I think I am somewhat confident with that topic now. The purpose of >> this Email

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 11:21:36AM +0100, Yu Jin wrote: > what could be deleted? My first thought is that we could delete all of > those executables, which are the exact same size as "magick.exe", like > "convert.exe", "compare.exe" Wwe could delete "ffmpeg.exe" aswell, > because its not in th

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

Am Fr., 6. März 2020 um 10:21 Uhr schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes < lasgout...@lyx.org>: > What I would propose for this kind of problem is to bundle a portable > version of imagemagick with LyX. I would expect that this does not > require registry hacking. > Portable version would not need registry

Re: Registry handling on windows (installer)

Le 06/03/2020 à 09:08, Yu Jin a écrit : Hi all, I've been training nsis and experimenting with the windows installer. I think I am somewhat confident with that topic now. The purpose of this Email is that I see some issues in the registry handling in the code for the installer and I

Registry handling on windows (installer)

Hi all, I've been training nsis and experimenting with the windows installer. I think I am somewhat confident with that topic now. The purpose of this Email is that I see some issues in the registry handling in the code for the installer and I would like to discuss those issues. 1. We creat

Re: Perl and Indexing? [Re: Building windows installer questions]

Am Di., 25. Feb. 2020 um 01:25 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck < rikih...@lyx.org>: > Actually, I will shortly be uploading 2.3.4.4, with that fix. So you can > use that. > I think that the installer versioning got a little confusing, LyX-2344-Installer-4.exe lets me think, that LyX 2.3.4.4 has

New Windows Installer For Testing

I've put a new Windows installer here     http://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/devel/lyx-2.3/ for testing. It is meant to fix bug #11750, which prevents proper collection of TeX files on Windows. Riki -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel

Re: Perl and Indexing? [Re: Building windows installer questions]

On 2/24/20 2:30 PM, Yu Jin wrote: > Am So., 23. Feb. 2020 um 11:23 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > mailto:sp...@lyx.org>>: > > Am Samstag, den 22.02.2020, 12:03 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > > Am I right that the splitindex_command LyXRC variable is not handled > > in the UI?

Re: Perl and Indexing? [Re: Building windows installer questions]

On 2/24/20 2:30 PM, Yu Jin wrote: > Am So., 23. Feb. 2020 um 11:23 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > mailto:sp...@lyx.org>>: > > Am Samstag, den 22.02.2020, 12:03 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > > Am I right that the splitindex_command LyXRC variable is not handled > > in the UI?

Re: Perl and Indexing? [Re: Building windows installer questions]

Am So., 23. Feb. 2020 um 11:23 Uhr schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 22.02.2020, 12:03 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > > Am I right that the splitindex_command LyXRC variable is not handled > > in the UI? > > Yes. We take the first we find. > Looks like I should leave the Per

Re: Perl and Indexing? [Re: Building windows installer questions]

Am Samstag, den 22.02.2020, 12:03 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > Am I right that the splitindex_command LyXRC variable is not handled > in the UI? Yes. We take the first we find. Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-dev

Re: Perl and Indexing? [Re: Building windows installer questions]

On 2/22/20 12:28 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Freitag, den 21.02.2020, 10:56 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: >> On 2/21/20 4:20 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >>> Am Mittwoch, den 19.02.2020, 15:11 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly >>> Heck: Jürgen, do you know about this? >>> I know ze

Re: Perl and Indexing? [Re: Building windows installer questions]

Am Freitag, den 21.02.2020, 10:56 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > On 2/21/20 4:20 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, den 19.02.2020, 15:11 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly > > Heck: > > > Jürgen, do you know about this? > > I know zero about the win installer. > > I meant: Do you

Re: Perl and Indexing? [Re: Building windows installer questions]

Am Mittwoch, den 19.02.2020, 15:11 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck: > Jürgen, do you know about this? I know zero about the win installer. Jürgen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailm

Re: Perl and Indexing? [Re: Building windows installer questions]

Am Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:36:37 -0500 schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 2/20/20 5:36 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:40:27 +0100 > > schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes : > > > >> Le 19 février 2020 21:47:05 GMT+01:00, Kornel Benko a > >> écrit : > I'm trying to remember why

Re: Perl and Indexing? [Re: Building windows installer questions]

On 2/20/20 5:39 PM, Richard Kimberly Heck wrote: > On 2/20/20 5:10 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Le 20/02/2020 à 11:36, Kornel Benko a écrit : >>> No, why should it? If we provide lyx, we do not provide python. >>> >>> OTOH, package 'texlive-binaries' needs perl for instance and package >>> 't

Re: Perl and Indexing? [Re: Building windows installer questions]

On 2/20/20 5:10 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Le 20/02/2020 à 11:36, Kornel Benko a écrit : >> No, why should it? If we provide lyx, we do not provide python. >> >> OTOH, package 'texlive-binaries' needs perl for instance and package >> 'texlive-base' wants >> 'perl-tk'. > > Yes, it is the purp

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >