Pavel Sanda wrote:
> i would let "View [Other formats]" to be "View (Other formats)"
> for better discernment from "View [format]".
OK.
> > > i still volunteer for adding the rc entry since
> > > clearly we are not able to agree what the good ui is.
> >
> >
> > No, please don't clutter the pref
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
>I've done that. Please test.
i would let "View [Other formats]" to be "View (Other formats)"
for better discernment from "View [format]".
> > i still volunteer for adding the rc entry since
> > clearly we are not able to agree what the good ui is.
>
> No, please don't
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > How about appending this to the entry then, as in "View [PDF
> > (pdflatex)]"?
>
> better than nothing.
I've done that. Please test.
> i still volunteer for adding the rc entry since
> clearly we are not able to agree what the good ui is.
No, please don't clutter the pr
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> i found another bug meanwhile - the other format in toolbar is not
> remembered through the sessions.
This is no bug. It is not supposed to do that (yet).
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > eyes need to see the 'pdflatex' string somewhere in the menu to get quick
> > orientation and better on a constant place with other formats.
>
> How about appending this to the entry then, as in "View [PDF (pdflatex)]"?
better than nothing. i sti
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> eyes need to see the 'pdflatex' string somewhere in the menu to get quick
> orientation and better on a constant place with other formats.
How about appending this to the entry then, as in "View [PDF (pdflatex)]"?
Jürgen
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> It would be a duplicate of UI entries. I'm not opposed, but it's certainly
> not
> good UI design.
eyes need to see the 'pdflatex' string somewhere in the menu to get quick
orientation and better on a constant place with other formats.
i propose this patch. it could
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> nice, i see it now. there is small issue - the small down-arrow in the icon
> appears only after first use. this is intended?
No.
> my basic question was a bit different though - would you be against the
> inclusion the default output format in the view submenu?
It would b
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Pavel Sanda wrote:
> > little bit of hijacking but anyway: the new formats machinery is kinda
> > confusing for me since i use and often switch between postscript and
> > pdf(latex) output. i can't use it directly from toolbar as it was till
> > now,
>
> Sure you can
Pavel Sanda wrote:
> little bit of hijacking but anyway: the new formats machinery is kinda
> confusing for me since i use and often switch between postscript and
> pdf(latex) output. i can't use it directly from toolbar as it was till
> now,
Sure you can. For instance, you can set the default
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
> Alex Fernandez wrote:
> > I think that requesting such a feature is wrapping the bandage before
> > you get the cut: nobody has asked for it and it is likely it will
> > never be a problem anyway. Why not create different HTML converters
> > and see if it is actually a p
11 matches
Mail list logo
