Am 15.02.2015 um 17:21 schrieb Richard Heck:
I think "PDF (E-book)" would be misleading. It suggests something more
is going on than just a lower resolution.
OK. I changed it now to "lower resolution"
(since the resolution is not really low (that would be 72dpi according
to most info in the w
Richard Heck wrote:
> I think "PDF (E-book)" would be misleading. It suggests something more
> is going on than just a lower resolution.
+1
Another disadvantage is that users might think that this format is only
usable for ebooks, but this is not true.
Georg
On 02/15/2015 10:52 AM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 15.02.2015 um 11:26 schrieb Georg Baum:
We could also name it "PDF (low resolution)", but this is much
longer, and I
thought the more accurate description would be better. The
overcrowded menu
is indeed not nice, so I am fine wth the current status a
Am 15.02.2015 um 11:26 schrieb Georg Baum:
We could also name it "PDF (low resolution)", but this is much longer, and I
thought the more accurate description would be better. The overcrowded menu
is indeed not nice, so I am fine wth the current status as well. Richard, I
guess this should also b
Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> However, the export menu is now overcrowded in my opinion. The 150 dpi-
> converter has a very limited target audience and should therefore not be
> by default in the main export menu.
I put it there because the cropped pdf was already in the export menu (which
is IMHO needed
On 02/14/2015 09:29 PM, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
Am 08.02.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Georg Baum:
I think the reason why it does not exist already is that nobody asked
for
such an option yet.
Hi Georg,
thanks for the implementation.
However, the export menu is now overcrowded in my opinion. The 150
dpi-
Am 08.02.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Georg Baum:
I think the reason why it does not exist already is that nobody asked for
such an option yet.
Hi Georg,
thanks for the implementation.
However, the export menu is now overcrowded in my opinion. The 150 dpi-
converter has a very limited target audien
Liviu Andronic writes:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>> Liviu Andronic writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:04 AM, James wrote:
>
On a similar note, AFAIK most of the size reduction comes from Ghostscript
reducing the size of the raster images
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> Liviu Andronic writes:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:04 AM, James wrote:
>>>
>>> On a similar note, AFAIK most of the size reduction comes from Ghostscript
>>> reducing the size of the raster images and those with raster components.
Liviu Andronic writes:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:04 AM, James wrote:
>>>
>>
>> On a similar note, AFAIK most of the size reduction comes from Ghostscript
>> reducing the size of the raster images and those with raster components. The
>> next level of usability (beyond using a converter on a w
James wrote:
> As a user and not a developer, it would be very handy to have the
> description of how to add a converter to reduce the PDF output size in a
> wiki entry. Yesterday I made a recommendation to three people to add the
> converters. I pointed them to the lyx-devel list, but none were a
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Agreed. I would only propose that we provide two additional
> converters: one for TeX fonts and other for non-TeX fonts. Since this
> would be for draft, non-final documents, it really should not matter
> less which exact converter of each type is being used. But some users
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 12:04 AM, James wrote:
>>
>
> On a similar note, AFAIK most of the size reduction comes from Ghostscript
> reducing the size of the raster images and those with raster components. The
> next level of usability (beyond using a converter on a whole document) would
> be to hav
>
>
>
On a similar note, AFAIK most of the size reduction comes from Ghostscript
reducing the size of the raster images and those with raster components.
The next level of usability (beyond using a converter on a whole document)
would be to have an option within the figure float setting or graphic
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 8:49 AM, Liviu Andronic
wrote:
>
> Agreed. I would only propose that we provide two additional
> converters: one for TeX fonts and other for non-TeX fonts. Since this
> would be for draft, non-final documents, it really should not matter
> less which exact converter of eac
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Georg Baum
wrote:
> Liviu Andronic wrote:
>
>> Actually my observation would be different, and IMO this is a somewhat
>> oft-requested feature:
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/127499
>> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/73209
>
Liviu Andronic wrote:
> Actually my observation would be different, and IMO this is a somewhat
> oft-requested feature:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.devel/127499
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.editors.lyx.general/73209
Sorry, it looks I am suffering from the selective memory d
On 02/08/2015 06:08 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Hi Georg,
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Georg Baum
wrote:
James wrote:
It would be great to see a button or Document menu item that gave an
option to view/compile in a reduced size by with ghostscript and setting
the -dPDFSETTINGS
switch to
Hi Georg,
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Georg Baum
wrote:
> James wrote:
>
>> It would be great to see a button or Document menu item that gave an
>> option to view/compile in a reduced size by with ghostscript and setting
>> the -dPDFSETTINGS
>> switch to one of the following
>> /screen (72d
James wrote:
> It would be great to see a button or Document menu item that gave an
> option to view/compile in a reduced size by with ghostscript and setting
> the -dPDFSETTINGS
> switch to one of the following
> /screen (72dpi), /ebook (150dpi), /printer (300dpi), /prepress (300dpi),
> /default
Is there any reason that an option within LyX to view or compile a reduced
size PDF?
For example, writing a graphic heavy document such as a thesis, which
includes large numbers of HQ photos, bitmaps, vector graphics that have
embedded raster images, can result in very large PDF files.
The PDF is
21 matches
Mail list logo
