On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, John Levon wrote:
> On 29 Nov 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
>
> > Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | In the UserGuide :
> > |
> > | The undo-mechanism has been limited to 100 steps in the beta-version, as this
> > | feature has not yet been properly te
On 29 Nov 2000, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | In the UserGuide :
> |
> | The undo-mechanism has been limited to 100 steps in the beta-version, as this
> | feature has not yet been properly tested out.
> |
> | Is this still true?
> |
> | In lyxfu
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Next question. Just beneath this last statement in the UserGuide we have:
|
| Notice that if you revert back all changes to arrive to the document as it
| was last saved, the "changed" status of the document is unfortunately not
| reset. This is a kn
Lars,
Just read your mail saying that a limit does exist. Fair enough. I'll modify
the UserGuide to say that this is so (ie, not a feature of the beta version,
now superceeded.)
Next question. Just beneath this last statement in the UserGuide we have:
Notice that if you revert back al
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| In the UserGuide :
|
| The undo-mechanism has been limited to 100 steps in the beta-version, as this
| feature has not yet been properly tested out.
|
| Is this still true?
|
| In lyxfunc.C::Dispatch()
| case LFUN_UNDO:
| disable
Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| In the UserGuide :
|
| The undo-mechanism has been limited to 100 steps in the beta-version, as this
| feature has not yet been properly tested out.
|
| Is this still true?
Probably not.
|
| In lyxfunc.C::Dispatch()
| case LFUN_UNDO:
|
In the UserGuide :
The undo-mechanism has been limited to 100 steps in the beta-version, as this
feature has not yet been properly tested out.
Is this still true?
In lyxfunc.C::Dispatch()
case LFUN_UNDO:
disable = buf->undostack.empty();
break;
I can se
