Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I would be surprised.
You'd be surprised if we didn't complain? Are we, as a group, that docile?
No, I'd be surprised that 4.3 cannot accept code that is valid in 4.2.
At least the documentation sugg
Richard Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I would be surprised.
> You'd be surprised if we didn't complain? Are we, as a group, that docile?
No, I'd be surprised that 4.3 cannot accept code that is valid in 4.2.
JMarc
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
Because then I would have used QDrag::start, just to get complains by
Qt 4.3 people that it does not complile.
I would be surprised.
You'd be surprised if we didn't complain? Are we, as a group, that docile?
rh
Stefan Schimanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Why cannot people use qt 4.2 for development? We have had a lot of
>> compatibility problems with qt 4.3.
I use Qt4.2 too. Usually problems are noticed pretty fast. What I am
not sure about, though, is whether somebody tests LyX 1.5.x with Qt 4.1.
On Saturday 15 March 2008 03:26:59 rgheck wrote:
> (Does F9 include 4.4? That's alpha right now
> anyway)
No. It usually enters rawhide (to be F9 now) when it is in the release
candidate stage. Since we one month away from F9 planned release I am sure it
will not come with F9. The scheduled
Am 15.03.2008 um 04:39 schrieb Bo Peng:
What to do about QDrag::exec is another question. Presumably Andre
will
have a good idea.
Why cannot people use qt 4.2 for development? We have had a lot of
compatibility problems with qt 4.3.
Because then I would have used QDrag::start, just to get
> What to do about QDrag::exec is another question. Presumably Andre will
> have a good idea.
Why cannot people use qt 4.2 for development? We have had a lot of
compatibility problems with qt 4.3.
Bo
rgheck wrote:
Bo Peng wrote:
src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp:1478: error: 'class QDrag' has no
member named 'exec'
Should we bump QT requirement to 4.3???
Oh, no, not another one of THESE discussions! I think the last time we
discussed this issue, we came to some kind of agreement that w
Bo Peng wrote:
src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp:1478: error: 'class QDrag' has no
member named 'exec'
Should we bump QT requirement to 4.3???
Oh, no, not another one of THESE discussions! I think the last time we
discussed this issue, we came to some kind of agreement that we'd stay
"a ve
src/frontends/qt4/GuiWorkArea.cpp:1478: error: 'class QDrag' has no
member named 'exec'
Should we bump QT requirement to 4.3???
Bo
10 matches
Mail list logo
