Re: Solved (was: Trac mails b0rken)

2013-05-14 Thread Pavel Sanda
Georg Baum wrote: > Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > Forget about it: Trac is innocent, @lyx.org eats those mails for spam > > reasons. Lelearning classifier with false positives from last days put > > things back into order. > > Indeed, I discovered the missing messages in the spam folder as well. How

Re: Solved (was: Trac mails b0rken)

2013-05-14 Thread Georg Baum
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Forget about it: Trac is innocent, @lyx.org eats those mails for spam > reasons. Lelearning classifier with false positives from last days put > things back into order. Indeed, I discovered the missing messages in the spam folder as well. How did you relearn? I just deleted

Solved (was: Trac mails b0rken)

2013-05-14 Thread Pavel Sanda
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: > > [logging] > > log_file = trac.log > > log_level = WARN > > log_type = syslog > > > > which is supposed to put the logfile in /home/lyx/www/trac/log/trac.log, if > > No, it is not. log_type = syslog means it goes to system's syslog, it seems > I'm > ab

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-14 Thread Pavel Sanda
Richard Heck wrote: > [logging] > log_file = trac.log > log_level = WARN > log_type = syslog > > which is supposed to put the logfile in /home/lyx/www/trac/log/trac.log, if No, it is not. log_type = syslog means it goes to system's syslog, it seems I'm able to switch this into log_type = file in

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-13 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
> > > > > We really thought you received everything, because you agreed on > > everything that we decided. > > Seriously: It would be good to fix this ASAP. I just browsed though the > latest changes and saw that you asked me to look at bug 4812, but I did not > get any mail. Therefore I believe th

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-13 Thread Stephan Witt
Am 14.05.2013 um 01:25 schrieb Richard Heck : > On 05/13/2013 06:32 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Richard Heck wrote: Seriously: It would be good to fix this ASAP. I just browsed though the latest changes and saw that you asked me to look at bug 4812, but I did not get any mail. Therefo

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-13 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/13/2013 06:32 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Richard Heck wrote: Seriously: It would be good to fix this ASAP. I just browsed though the latest changes and saw that you asked me to look at bug 4812, but I did not get any mail. Therefore I believe that there are comments I should be notified of. I

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-13 Thread Pavel Sanda
Richard Heck wrote: >> Seriously: It would be good to fix this ASAP. I just browsed though the >> latest changes and saw that you asked me to look at bug 4812, but I did >> not get any mail. Therefore I believe that there are comments I should be >> notified of. > > I'm not sure what would be caus

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-13 Thread Richard Heck
On 05/13/2013 04:01 PM, Georg Baum wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: On Sunday, May 12, 2013, Pavel Sanda wrote: Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: I got them all. ldm conspiracy :)) We really thought you received everything, because you agreed on everything that we decided. Seriously:

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-13 Thread Georg Baum
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > On Sunday, May 12, 2013, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >>> I got them all. >> >> ldm conspiracy :)) >> > > We really thought you received everything, because you agreed on > everything that we decided. Seriously: It would be good to fix

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
On Sunday, May 12, 2013, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: >> I got them all. > > ldm conspiracy :)) > We really thought you received everything, because you agreed on everything that we decided. Vincent

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-12 Thread Pavel Sanda
Vincent van Ravesteijn wrote: > I got them all. ldm conspiracy :))

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-12 Thread Vincent van Ravesteijn
Op 12-5-2013 20:56, Pavel Sanda schreef: Georg Baum wrote: Indeed it seems if CC myself with lyx unrelated email it works, if I'm CC-ed either as sanda or sa...@lyx.org I get nothing (the @lyx.org mail work fine itself though). I don't get any trac mail either, but I do get the cvs list emails

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-12 Thread Julien Rioux
On 12/05/2013 2:56 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: Georg Baum wrote: Indeed it seems if CC myself with lyx unrelated email it works, if I'm CC-ed either as sanda or sa...@lyx.org I get nothing (the @lyx.org mail work fine itself though). I don't get any trac mail either, but I do get the cvs list email

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-12 Thread Pavel Sanda
Georg Baum wrote: > > Indeed it seems if CC myself with lyx unrelated email it works, if I'm > > CC-ed either as sanda or sa...@lyx.org I get nothing (the @lyx.org mail > > work fine itself though). > > I don't get any trac mail either, but I do get the cvs list emails to the > .lyx.org address.

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-12 Thread Georg Baum
Pavel Sanda wrote: > Liviu Andronic wrote: >> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: >> > Seems I'm no more getting mails when bugs are changed in trac. >> > Anyone else? >> > >> I'm getting mines. > > Indeed it seems if CC myself with lyx unrelated email it works, if I'm > CC-ed ei

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-12 Thread Pavel Sanda
Liviu Andronic wrote: > On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > Seems I'm no more getting mails when bugs are changed in trac. > > Anyone else? > > > I'm getting mines. Indeed it seems if CC myself with lyx unrelated email it works, if I'm CC-ed either as sanda or sa...@lyx.org I

Re: Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-12 Thread Liviu Andronic
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote: > Seems I'm no more getting mails when bugs are changed in trac. > Anyone else? > I'm getting mines. Liviu -- Do you know how to read? http://www.alienetworks.com/srtest.cfm http://goodies.xfce.org/projects/applications/xfce4-dict#speed-reade

Trac mails b0rken

2013-05-12 Thread Pavel Sanda
Seems I'm no more getting mails when bugs are changed in trac. Anyone else?