Le 27/08/2016 à 22:20, Richard Heck a écrit :
On 08/26/2016 03:43 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
At least 10089 is trivial enough to be backported. My insert>caption patch can
be delayed if you prefer, but basically what it does is the original intended
behavior (code was buggy).
I will have
On 08/26/2016 03:43 PM, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> At least 10089 is trivial enough to be backported. My insert>caption patch
> can be delayed if you prefer, but basically what it does is the original
> intended behavior (code was buggy).
>
> I will have to remove C++11-isms though.
Go ahead
At least 10089 is trivial enough to be backported. My insert>caption patch can
be delayed if you prefer, but basically what it does is the original intended
behavior (code was buggy).
I will have to remove C++11-isms though.
Jmarc
Le 26 août 2016 20:44:23 GMT+02:00, Richard Heck a écrit :
>
We have fixed quite a few bugs in stable, and this bug
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/10340
is sufficiently problematic that it seems a good time to start thinking
about a 2.2.2 release.
You can look here
http://www.lyx.org/trac/wiki/BugTrackerHome
to see bugs targeted to 2.2.2. Are th
