On 26 Apr 1999, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> >> Allan Rae writes:
> AR> Just say no to RTTI. I'll try extra hard to have a closer look
> AR> at your work but we really should try to avoid the need for RTTI
> AR> of any kind.
>
> Why?
>
> IMHO dynamic_cast is a solution for a lot of prob
>> Allan Rae writes:
AR> Just say no to RTTI. I'll try extra hard to have a closer look
AR> at your work but we really should try to avoid the need for RTTI
AR> of any kind.
Why?
IMHO dynamic_cast is a solution for a lot of problems.
Lgb
PS.
I am back from my unannounced trip t
On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Asger Alstrup Nielsen wrote:
> > - Gtk/Gnome will hopefully be used too as soon as some coordinated
> > effort emerges
>
> Well, first we need the feature in GTK+ to initialize on an existing display.
> If somebody on this list is also subscribed to the GTK list, please forw
> - xforms will probably remain for at least some time
Yes, we will implement the new kernel and drop it into the existing code base,
so the XForms skin will probably stay for starters.
> - fltk could be used as a very small almost drop-in repacement for
> xforms
If somebody is up to it, I thin
> "Steven" == Steven van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Steven> Hi, is there already any consencus about which toolkits will
Steven> be used for the userinterface? I know someone offered to do
Steven> Gtk, but this does not seem to be a cross-platform toolkit. Is
Steven> the question still
Hi,
is there already any consencus about which toolkits will be used for the
userinterface? I know someone offered to do Gtk, but this does not seem to
be a cross-platform toolkit. Is the question still open about which toolkit
(which contains Windows support) to use?
