On Sat, 22 Feb 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Allan Rae wrote:
>
> > A 20 second scan of the code in LoadQueue.C suggests that push_front()
> > and pop_front() is the reason your queue is acting like a stack.
> >
> > Try pushing on one end and popping off the other.
>
> Sorry Allan, I've tried
Allan Rae wrote:
> A 20 second scan of the code in LoadQueue.C suggests that push_front()
> and pop_front() is the reason your queue is acting like a stack.
>
> Try pushing on one end and popping off the other.
Sorry Allan, I've tried to answer you by mail but with no luck. It is
supposed to wor
Angus Leeming wrote:
> I've also added you to the CREDITS file; there's no escape now!
>
Iujuuu!... thanks.
Alfredo
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
>
>> Ah, I see. A call to startLoading within LoadNext() can summon other
>> redraws and end up in a touch(), maybe? In this case, the bucket is
>> needed but not the locking. I will try this.
>
> And it works like a charm. I've tried to corr
Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> Ah, I see. A call to startLoading within LoadNext() can summon other
> redraws and end up in a touch(), maybe? In this case, the bucket is needed
> but not the locking. I will try this.
And it works like a charm. I've tried to correct also the withespace, and
I'm attac
John Levon wrote:
> I don't quite follow what context is racing with what other context.
> Remember the timer is based on a GUI implementation so can't "interrupt"
> any straight-line code that doesn't go back to the event loop...
Actually, there's something fishy going on. I've removed the bucke
On Fri, 21 Feb 2003, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> 1) I'm still investigating how to solve the startup problem. (images get
> loaded in reverse order). Clues welcomed.
A 20 second scan of the code in LoadQueue.C suggests that push_front()
and pop_front() is the reason your queue is acting like a st
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 02:13:12AM +0100, Alfredo Braunstein wrote:
> 2) I've changed bucket_ to a pointer, so to reduce the swapping time to one
> operation (which is indeed threads-safe), because swap is defined as a
> template:
You know you can specialise this template, right ? I'm sure there
Here is what I've got. It work and seems to be fast.
A few notes, though.
1) I'm still investigating how to solve the startup problem. (images get
loaded in reverse order). Clues welcomed.
2) I've changed bucket_ to a pointer, so to reduce the swapping time to one
operation (which is indeed thre
