Re: Can't compile 1.5svn for testing again.

2006-11-06 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Abdelrazak Younes wrote: Georg Baum wrote: Try again. I don't understand why it worked for me. Pre-compiled headers? Georg> On one machine yes, but not on the other one, and it worked on Georg> both. it

Re: Can't compile 1.5svn for testing again.

2006-11-06 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Georg> Abdelrazak Younes wrote: >> Georg Baum wrote: >>> Try again. I don't understand why it worked for me. >> Pre-compiled headers? Georg> On one machine yes, but not on the other one, and it worked on Georg> both. it works when assertio

Re: Can't compile 1.5svn for testing again.

2006-11-06 Thread Georg Baum
Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: >> Try again. I don't understand why it worked for me. > > Pre-compiled headers? On one machine yes, but not on the other one, and it worked on both. Georg

Re: Can't compile 1.5svn for testing again.

2006-11-06 Thread Abdelrazak Younes
Georg Baum wrote: Helge Hafting wrote: I wanted to test new fixes, particularly branch stuff. Compiling throws up this though: Try again. I don't understand why it worked for me. Pre-compiled headers?

Re: Can't compile 1.5svn for testing again.

2006-11-06 Thread Georg Baum
Helge Hafting wrote: > I wanted to test new fixes, particularly branch stuff. > Compiling throws up this though: Try again. I don't understand why it worked for me. Georg

Can't compile 1.5svn for testing again.

2006-11-06 Thread Helge Hafting
I wanted to test new fixes, particularly branch stuff. Compiling throws up this though: messages.C: In member function ‘const lyx::docstring lyx::Messages::Pimpl::get(c onst std::string&) const’: messages.C:116: error: ‘BOOST_CURRENT_FUNCTION’ was not declared in this scope messages.C:130: er

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-12 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 08:58:24AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | Either I have still some serious mail troubles or everybody keeps >> | ignoring meeting related messages... >> >> :-) >> >> I wil

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-11 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 09:34:14AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Friday 13. aug. > 0630 -> leaving Oslo > 0840 -> arriving Frankfurt > 1215 -> leaving Frankfurt > 1310 -> arriving Dresden > > I'll be bored in Frankfurt for sure... Given that Frankfurt Airport is pretty close to the city (ni

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-11 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 08:58:24AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | Either I have still some serious mail troubles or everybody keeps >> | ignoring meeting related messages... >> >> :-) >> >> I wil

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-11 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 18:37, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > I will arrive to Dresden next Thursday at 13.30, I think that > > Jean-Marc will arrive soon after that. Am I correct? > > I thought he said '12:30'. Depending on your localization of 'after' and > 'soon' this might translate to 'soon afte

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-11 Thread Jose' Matos
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 18:37, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > I will arrive to Dresden next Thursday at 13.30, I think that > > Jean-Marc will arrive soon after that. Am I correct? > > I thought he said '12:30'. Depending on your localization of 'after' and > 'soon' this might translate to 'soon afte

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 08:58:24AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: >> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> | Either I have still some serious mail troubles or everybody keeps >> | ignoring meeting related messages... >> >> :-) >> >> I wil

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 09:56:24AM +0100, Jose' Matos wrote: > On Monday 09 August 2004 20:33, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > Either I have still some serious mail troubles or everybody keeps > > ignoring meeting related messages... > > Almost certainly it is your fault. ;-) Possibly. > I will arr

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 10:29:40AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Lars> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Lars> | Either I have still some serious mail troubles or everybody > Lars> keeps | ignoring meeting related

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-10 Thread Andre Poenitz
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 08:58:24AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Either I have still some serious mail troubles or everybody keeps > | ignoring meeting related messages... > > :-) > > I will just be there... When approximately? > btw. what

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-10 Thread Jose' Matos
On Monday 09 August 2004 20:33, Andre Poenitz wrote: > Either I have still some serious mail troubles or everybody keeps > ignoring meeting related messages... Almost certainly it is your fault. ;-) I will arrive to Dresden next Thursday at 13.30, I think that Jean-Marc will arrive soon after

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-10 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> | Either I have still some serious mail troubles or everybody Lars> keeps | ignoring meeting related messages... Lars> :-) Lars> I will just be there... Lars> btw. what address

Re: Testing again.

2004-08-10 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Either I have still some serious mail troubles or everybody keeps | ignoring meeting related messages... :-) I will just be there... btw. what address in Chemnitz am I going to? -- Lgb

Testing again.

2004-08-09 Thread Andre Poenitz
Either I have still some serious mail troubles or everybody keeps ignoring meeting related messages... Andre'