Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-12 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Peter Kümmel wrote: > Is this still valid? > > * open Tutorial; click on TOC: TOC dialog has no contents >    (only with --enable-stdlib-debug, has been seen on qt 4.2.2, gcc 4.1.2, >     openSuse 10.1/x32 and 10.2/x64, but is probably not OS/qt specific, but >     dependant on the compiler) Yes.

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-11 Thread Peter Kümmel
Updating Status.15x: Is this still valid? * open Tutorial; click on TOC: TOC dialog has no contents (only with --enable-stdlib-debug, has been seen on qt 4.2.2, gcc 4.1.2, openSuse 10.1/x32 and 10.2/x64, but is probably not OS/qt specific, but dependant on the compiler) And here a

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > A different bug is that LyX crashes when you move the slider in an empty > toc dialog. As I've just noticed, this seems to be independent from the > other bug. Just open a new doc, open the TOC dialog and move the slider. I > guess the slider should be disabled when the

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Am Sonntag, 7. Januar 2007 17:09 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > Maybe this patch wasn't that good: > http://www.lyx.org/trac/changeset/16571 I think this is completely unrelated. Jürgen

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Peter Kümmel
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Peter Kümmel wrote: >> But I still get now crash by >> 1. open lyx >> 2. open d_Intro >> 3. click toc >> 4. click on slider > > Do you get contents in the toc browser? This is the actual bug. > Yes I think so (I'm on Widows now, so I'm not 100& sure) > A different bu

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Peter Kümmel wrote: > But I still get now crash by > 1. open lyx > 2. open d_Intro > 3. click toc > 4. click on slider Do you get contents in the toc browser? This is the actual bug. A different bug is that LyX crashes when you move the slider in an empty toc dialog. As I've just noticed, this s

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Peter Kümmel
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Peter Kümmel wrote: >> I've called >> ./autogen >> ./configure --enable-stdlib-debug --with-qt-dir=/home/... >> but no _GLIBCXX are defined in the Makefiles > > I don't have it in the Makefiles either, but I have > > /* libstdc++ debug mode */ > #define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Peter Kümmel
Georg Baum wrote: > Am Sonntag, 7. Januar 2007 15:16 schrieb Peter Kümmel: >> Georg Baum wrote: >>> Qt4 does not (and should not, according to TT) honor QTDIR. >>> Use --with-qt4-dir=... >> Yes, I know, and --with-qt4-dir was my first attempt >> (see my last mail) but it doesn't work. > > No, you

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Georg Baum
Am Sonntag, 7. Januar 2007 15:16 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > Georg Baum wrote: > > Qt4 does not (and should not, according to TT) honor QTDIR. > > Use --with-qt4-dir=... > > Yes, I know, and --with-qt4-dir was my first attempt > (see my last mail) but it doesn't work. No, you used --with-qt-dir (if

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Peter Kümmel wrote: > I've called > ./autogen > ./configure --enable-stdlib-debug --with-qt-dir=/home/... > but no _GLIBCXX are defined in the Makefiles I don't have it in the Makefiles either, but I have /* libstdc++ debug mode */ #define _GLIBCXX_DEBUG 1 /* libstdc++ pedantic debug mode */ #d

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Peter Kümmel
Georg Baum wrote: > Am Sonntag, 7. Januar 2007 15:00 schrieb Peter Kümmel: >> So I've tried: >> export CXXFLAGS="-D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG=1 -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC=1" >> export QTDIR=/home/... >> this enables the macros but still does not use the correct Qt4 >> version. >> >> What's wrong with my setting

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Georg Baum
Am Sonntag, 7. Januar 2007 15:00 schrieb Peter Kümmel: > So I've tried: > export CXXFLAGS="-D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG=1 -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC=1" > export QTDIR=/home/... > this enables the macros but still does not use the correct Qt4 > version. > > What's wrong with my settings? Qt4 does not (and shou

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Peter Kümmel
Peter Kümmel wrote: > Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >> Peter Kümmel wrote: >>> I've tried to reproduce the TOC bug on Linux >>> but it failed: >>> >>> - Suse 10.2/32 >>> - Qt 4.2.2 (./configure -debug) >>> - lyx/cmake, wi

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Peter Kümmel
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Peter Kümmel wrote: >> I've tried to reproduce the TOC bug on Linux >> but it failed: >> >> - Suse 10.2/32 >> - Qt 4.2.2 (./configure -debug) >> - lyx/cmake, with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG=1 -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC=1 > >>

Re: TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller
Peter Kümmel wrote: > I've tried to reproduce the TOC bug on Linux > but it failed: > > - Suse 10.2/32 > - Qt 4.2.2 (./configure -debug) > - lyx/cmake, with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG=1 -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC=1 > Isn't this the configuration which should reproduce the b

TOC bug on Linux

2007-01-07 Thread Peter Kümmel
I've tried to reproduce the TOC bug on Linux but it failed: - Suse 10.2/32 - Qt 4.2.2 (./configure -debug) - lyx/cmake, with -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG=1 -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG_PEDANTIC=1 Isn't this the configuration which should reproduce the bug? Peter