Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 25 nov. 2010 ? 21:13, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
> > Hope it's not too late.. I'm not sure that "R literate programming" is
> > the best way to label the functionality. The main reason is that in
> > the R community Sweave is the one and only name for this.
>
> Agre
Le 25 nov. 2010 à 21:13, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
> Hope it's not too late.. I'm not sure that "R literate programming" is
> the best way to label the functionality. The main reason is that in
> the R community Sweave is the one and only name for this.
Agreed. However, we need to make sure that p
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>> in lists of modules we have "Sweave" and "Noweb literate programming"
>>> both described as a tool for literate programming, so i guess
>>> we should call "Sweave" module as a "Sweave literate programming".
>>
>>
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 25/11/2010 01:38, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
>> JMarc and others,
>>
>> in lists of modules we have "Sweave" and "Noweb literate programming"
>> both described as a tool for literate programming, so i guess
>> we should call "Sweave" module as a "Sweave literate programm
Le 25/11/2010 01:38, Pavel Sanda a écrit :
JMarc and others,
in lists of modules we have "Sweave" and "Noweb literate programming"
both described as a tool for literate programming, so i guess
we should call "Sweave" module as a "Sweave literate programming".
I'd prefer "R literate programming
JMarc and others,
in lists of modules we have "Sweave" and "Noweb literate programming"
both described as a tool for literate programming, so i guess
we should call "Sweave" module as a "Sweave literate programming".
otoh won't i break something if this patch is applied?
pavel
diff --git a/lib/l
