Re: Strategy proposal for general optional arguments

2002-02-28 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 09:54:12AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Lars> I'd really like it to wait... > > Lars> I belive that we now are too close to a release to have time to > Lars> get ant experience with this. Much

Re: Strategy proposal for general optional arguments

2002-02-28 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> I'd really like it to wait... Lars> I belive that we now are too close to a release to have time to Lars> get ant experience with this. Much better to do this early in Lars> 1.3CVS then we will have time to do it properly and

Re: Strategy proposal for general optional arguments

2002-02-27 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 04:14:00PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: ... > Nice :) Of course, you will need to do a few things, like changing '\' > to \backslash. Hmmm... this would sabotage the easy (but dangerous) use of LaTeX inside the string. How do LaTeX insets like cite do it? Does

Re: Strategy proposal for general optional arguments

2002-02-27 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Hmmm Jean-Marc, could I sway you by telling that in my local Martin> tree, I have this inset syntax already working? It's fake, of Martin> course; the optional parameter is still entered in a gray box Martin> in FormParagraph; b

Re: Strategy proposal for general optional arguments

2002-02-26 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 07:18:11PM +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: ... > > So the right way is probably to use a collapsable insettext to do what > > we want. But this will not happen in 1.2.0 frame. ... > My proposal looks slightly better in this respect. Cleaner. But yes, > there will be ext

Re: Strategy proposal for general optional arguments

2002-02-26 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 05:06:57PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Martin> Actually, having thought about this, I have come up with a > Martin> much simpler and more elegant approach, that ought to work, is > Martin> sufficien

Re: Strategy proposal for general optional arguments

2002-02-26 Thread Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
> "Martin" == Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Martin> Actually, having thought about this, I have come up with a Martin> much simpler and more elegant approach, that ought to work, is Martin> sufficiently general and for which we already have the Martin> infrastructure. [...] Mar

Strategy proposal for general optional arguments

2002-02-25 Thread Martin Vermeer
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 04:46:54PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: ... > There could be a C++ solution to the problem, which would not be too > difficult. It would go like this > > Style ShortVersion > LatexType OptArg > ... > End > > Style Caption > LatexType Command > UseOp