On 04/20/2014 03:04 AM, José Matos wrote:
Particularly I would like to thank Jürgen for tackling beamer to a
reasonable/sensible shape, that was something that was on my list for
several years.
This is going to take some adjustment from our users, as we have already
seen. But it really, reall
On Saturday 19 April 2014 18:57:58 Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I did ome statistics for 2.1 dev cycle.
>
> First of all, Jose, do you understand that your continous
> (1.6-0.59,2.0-0.68,2.1-0.75) peaking towards 100% happiness
> ratio is pretty depressing for the rest of
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Guys,
>
> I did ome statistics for 2.1 dev cycle.
>
> First of all, Jose, do you understand that your continous
> (1.6-0.59,2.0-0.68,2.1-0.75) peaking towards 100% happiness
> ratio is pretty depressing for the rest o
Guys,
I did ome statistics for 2.1 dev cycle.
First of all, Jose, do you understand that your continous
(1.6-0.59,2.0-0.68,2.1-0.75) peaking towards 100% happiness
ratio is pretty depressing for the rest of us???
Calm down pretty please or drop below 100 mails! :)
Trunk
