Am 17.02.2016 um 21:11 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
tars from current master are there:
Now everything works for me - the .gz and the .xz file is correct
(opened with WinRar).
regards Uwe
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:31:47AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
>> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> >> For the fun of it I dug up a spare Windows machine and tried unpacking
>> >> the beta2 XZ archive using 7-Zip and PeaZip, two open-source file
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:31:47AM -0800, Pavel Sanda wrote:
> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >> For the fun of it I dug up a spare Windows machine and tried unpacking
> >> the beta2 XZ archive using 7-Zip and PeaZip, two open-source file
> >> archivers for Windows, and ran into the same 100-char tr
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>> For the fun of it I dug up a spare Windows machine and tried unpacking
>> the beta2 XZ archive using 7-Zip and PeaZip, two open-source file
>> archivers for Windows, and ran into the same 100-char truncation
>> issue. However, no such issues with Total Commander's int
Le 17/02/2016 17:51, Liviu Andronic a écrit :
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Georg Baum
wrote:
is possible to compile on Windows from the self-contained archive. There
is a problem with extracting the tar on Windows, so I have just sent Uwe
a zip file containing the same files that the tar co
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Georg Baum
wrote:
>> is possible to compile on Windows from the self-contained archive. There
>> is a problem with extracting the tar on Windows, so I have just sent Uwe
>> a zip file containing the same files that the tar contains.
>
> I would formulate it differe
Am 17.02.2016 um 01:01 schrieb Uwe Stöhr :
>
> Am 16.02.2016 um 20:06 schrieb Georg Baum:
>
>> I would formulate it differently: There is a problem with extracting the
>> tar with the tool Uwe used.
>
> It is a simple path name length restriction. In the tar the path cannot be
> longer than
>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:01:42AM +0100, Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Am 16.02.2016 um 20:06 schrieb Georg Baum:
>
> >I would formulate it differently: There is a problem with extracting the
> >tar with the tool Uwe used.
>
> It is a simple path name length restriction. In the tar the path cannot be
> lo
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 08:06:14PM +0100, Georg Baum wrote:
> Scott Kostyshak wrote:
>
> > Just an update for those who have not been following the other
> > conversations, and also a question:
> >
> > beta2 has been tagged, and the tars have been posted. We have not
> > formally released it beca
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:11:03AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> Le 15/02/2016 22:33, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
> >beta2 has been tagged, and the tars have been posted. We have not
> >formally released it because we are still trying to make it so that it
> >is possible to compile on Windows
Am 16.02.2016 um 20:06 schrieb Georg Baum:
I would formulate it differently: There is a problem with extracting the
tar with the tool Uwe used.
It is a simple path name length restriction. In the tar the path cannot
be longer than
lyx-2.2.0beta2\3rdparty\boost\boost\numeric\conversion\deta
Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> Just an update for those who have not been following the other
> conversations, and also a question:
>
> beta2 has been tagged, and the tars have been posted. We have not
> formally released it because we are still trying to make it so that it
> is possible to compile on
Am 15.02.2016 um 22:33 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
Just an update for those who have not been following the other
conversations, and also a question:
beta2 has been tagged, and the tars have been posted. We have not
formally released it because we are still trying to make it so that it
is possibl
Le 15/02/2016 22:33, Scott Kostyshak a écrit :
beta2 has been tagged, and the tars have been posted. We have not
formally released it because we are still trying to make it so that it
is possible to compile on Windows from the self-contained archive. There
is a problem with extracting the tar on
Am 15.02.2016 um 22:33 schrieb Scott Kostyshak:
If the zip file extracts correctly and Uwe can compile for Windows,
I can. The Zip file is sufficient to build LyX. Here's the installer:
http://ftp.lyx.de/LyX%202.2.0beta-2/
regards Uwe
Just an update for those who have not been following the other
conversations, and also a question:
beta2 has been tagged, and the tars have been posted. We have not
formally released it because we are still trying to make it so that it
is possible to compile on Windows from the self-contained arch
16 matches
Mail list logo
